Skip to main content
Log in

The proper sequence for correcting correlation coefficients for range restriction and unreliability

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrections of correlations for range restriction (i.e., selection) and unreliability are common in psychometric work. The current rule of thumb for determining the order in which to apply these corrections looks to the nature of the reliability estimate (i.e., restricted or unrestricted). While intuitive, this rule of thumb is untenable when the correction includes the variable upon which selection is made, as is generally the case. Using classical test theory, we show that it is the nature of the range restriction, not the nature of the available reliability coefficient, that determines the sequence for applying corrections for range restriction and unreliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bobko, P. (1983). An analysis of correlations corrected for attenuation and range restriction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 584–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callender, J.C., & Osburn, H.G. (1980). Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1994). Correcting for sources of artificial variation across studies. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.),The handbook of research synthesis (xxx–xxx). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., Miller, K.J., & Graham, W.K. (1982). Corrections for restriction of range and attenuation in criterion-related validation studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 637–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J.L., & Mumford, M. (1987). Corrections for attenuation and range restriction on the predictor.Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs.Royal Society Philosophical Transactions, Series A, 200, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, N.S., & Burke, M.J. (1983). Two new procedures for studying validity generalization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 382–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, N.S., Burke, M.J., Normand, J., & Langlois, G.M. (1991). A new meta-analytic approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 432–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things.American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1949).Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph M. Stauffer.

Additional information

We would like to thank Malcolm James Ree for his encouragement and helpful comments as well as those of the editors, associate editor, and reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stauffer, J.M., Mendoza, J.L. The proper sequence for correcting correlation coefficients for range restriction and unreliability. Psychometrika 66, 63–68 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295732

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295732

Key words

Navigation