Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of market structure on technological performance in the food-manufacturing industries

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tests the effect of firm and market structure variables on the rate of R&D investment by food processing firms. While the estimated relationship is consistent with the hypotheses of Schumpeter and Galbraith at small firm sizes and small-to-moderale concentration levels, above these critical values expected firm R&D increases at a decreasing rate with firm size and decreases with market concentration.

The second part of this paper examines the origins of process patents closely related to six food industries. On average U.S. firms outside the industry, foreign firms, and individuals were each assigned more food-industry patents than were U.S. food processing firm. These findings place the public policy interpretation of observed relationships between market power and firm technological performance into a broader perspective. Even if a reduction in market concentrationn reduced R&D originating within a food industry, this decrease might bede minimus relative to technological changes, originating outside the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comanor, W.S., and F.H. Scherer, “Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change”,Journal of Political Economy, 77 (May/June 1969), pp. 392–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Culbertson, J.D. “The Policy Interpretation of Econometric Tests of the Schumpeterian Hypothesis,” NC 117 Working Paper No. 57, Food Systems Research Group, University of Wisconsin, October 1981.

  3. Connor, J.M.,The Market Power of Multinntionals; A Quatitative Analysis of U.S. Corporations in Brazil and Mexico. (New York: Praeger, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Federal Trade Comission, “On the Influence of Market Structure on the Profit Performance of Food Manufacturing Companies,” Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission, September 1969.

  5. Galbraith, J.K.,American Capitalism: revised edition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, W., D. Mehta, and R. Vernon, “The R&D Factor in International Trade and International Investment of United States Industries,”Journal of Political Economy, 75 (January/February 1967), pp. 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horst, T., “Firm and Industry Determinants of the Decision to Invest Abroad: An Empirical Study,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 54 (August 1972): 258–266.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Imel, B., Behr, M., and P., Helmberger,Market Structure and Performance (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States 13th ed. New York. R. Bowker Co., 1970.

  10. Jewkes, J., Sawyers, D. and R. Stillerman,The Sources of Invention 2nd ed. (New York Norton, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamien, M., and N. Schwartz,Market Structure and Innovation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mansfield, E., A. Romeo, and S. Wagner, “Foreign Trade and U.S. Research and Development,”Review of Economic and Statistics, 61 (February 1979): 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marion, B., Mueller, W.F., Cotterill, R., Geithman, F., and J. Schmelzer,The Food Retailing Industry: Market Structure, Profits, and Prices, (New York: Praeger, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mueller, W.F.,The Celler-Kefauver Act: The First 27 Years A study prepared for the Subcommittee on Monopolics and Commercial Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, 89th Congress, Second Session, December 1978.

  15. —, “The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying Du Pont's Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920 to 1950”.The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller, W.F., Culbertson, J.D., and B. Peckham,Market Structure and Technological Performance in the Food Manufacturing Industrics, monograph 11, N.C. Project 117, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1982.

  17. National Commission On Food Marketing, Technical Study Number 8,The Structure of Food Manufacturing, 1966.

  18. Rogers, R. “Structure-Profits Relationship for Food Manufacturing Firms”, appendix D to (14).

  19. Rosenburg, N. “Technological Interdependence in the American Economy,”Technology and Culture, 20 (January 1979), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scherer, F.H. “Size of Firm, Oligopoly, and Research: Comment,”Canadian Journal of Economics, 31 (May 1965), pp. 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  21. — “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions”American Economic Review, 55 (December 1965). pp. 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  22. —, “Market Structure and the Employment of Sciencists and Engineers,”American Economic Review, 57 (June 1967): 524–31.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance 2nd ed. (Chicago. Hand McNally & Co., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schumpeter, J.A.,Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 3rd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Securities and Exchanges Commission,Form 10-K (Annually).

  26. Shepherd, W.. Appendix to “The Elements of Market Structure”,Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (February 1972). pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  27. U.S. Bureau of the Census,Census of Manufactures 1967.

  28. U.S. Patent Office,Index of Patents, (various years).

  29. U.S. Patent Office,Manual of Classification, (various years).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culbertson, J.D., Mueller, W.F. The influence of market structure on technological performance in the food-manufacturing industries. Rev Ind Organ 2, 40–54 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354365

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354365

Keywords

Navigation