Skip to main content
Log in

The 2010 and 2011 Tsunamis in French Polynesia: Operational Aspects and Field Surveys

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a detailed timeline of the warning procedures as they unfolded at the Laboratoire de Géophysique in Papeete, Tahiti, during the nights of 26–27 February 2010 (Maule, Chile tsunami) and 10–11 March 2011 (Tohoku tsunami). In particular, we discuss how the flow of information available to the warning center (including seismic evaluations obtained both locally and from other warning centers, as well as maregraph and DART buoy data) built up and eventually led to red alerts, which the local authorities used in both cases to impose an evacuation of low-lying areas on 68 islands. While the alerts were successful in Polynesia, a difficulty arose in 2011 when the alert had to be reinstated immediately as the all clear was being declared, since the maximum amplitude was carried by the fourth wave packet. We also present a complete dataset of 119 values of run-up and inundation surveyed in the aftermath of the two tsunamis, principally in the Marquesas Islands where their effects were maximal, and on Tahiti and Moorea for the 2011 event. The highest run-up (4.45 m) was observed in 2011 in the Bay of Taipivai on Nuku Hiva, where seven houses were flooded. We find no clear correlation between run-up values at the same locations in 2010 and 2011, suggesting that local responses are controlled by details specific to each tsunami. In 2010, in the village of Puamau on Hiva Oa (Marquesas), a delayed harbor response, probably due to resonance of the bay upon arrival of short-period components dispersed outside the shallow-water approximation, flung a launch onto a wharf, 7 h after the first arrivals, and 2.5 h after issuance of the all clear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Brousse, R., H.-G. Barczus, H. Bellon, J.-M. Cantagrel, C. Diraison, H. Guillou, and C. Léotot, Les Marquises (Polynésie française): Volcanologie, géochronologie, discussion d’un modèle de point chaud, Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 8, 933–949, 1990.

  • Chauvel, C., W. McDonough, G. Guille, R. Maury, and R.A. Duncan, Contrasting old and young volcanism in Rurutu Island, Austral chain, Chem. Geol., 139, 125–143, 1997.

  • Dengler, L., B. Uslu, A. Barberopoulou, S.C. Kim, and A. Kelly, The November 15, 2006 Kuril Islands-generated tsunami in Crescent City, California. Pure Appl. Geophys., 166, 37–53, 2009.

  • Desonie, D.L., R.A. Duncan, and J.H. Natland, Temporal and geochemical variability of volcanic products of the Marquesas Hotspot, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 17649–17665, 1993.

  • Duncan, R.A., and I. McDougall, Migration of volcanism with time in the Marquesas Islands, French Polynesia, Earth Planet. Sci. Letts., 21, 414–420, 1974.

  • Duncan, R.A., and I. McDougall, Linear volcanism in French Polynesia, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 1, 197–227, 1976.

  • Fritz, H.M., C.E. Synolakis, and B.G. McAdoo, Maldives field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Earthquake Spectra, 22, S137–S154, 2006.

  • Fritz, H.M., C.H. Petroff, P.A. Catalá, R. Cienfuegos, P. Winckler, N. Kalligeris, R. Weiss, S.E. Barrientos, G. Meneses, C. Valderas-Bermejo, C.W. Ebeling, A. Papadopoulos, M. Contreras, R. Almar, J.C. Domínguez, and C.E. Synolakis, Field survey of the 27 February 2010 Chile tsunami, Pure Appl. Geophys., 168, 1989–2010, 2011.

  • Green, G., On the motion of waves in a variable canal of small width and depth, Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc., VI(IV), 6 pp., 1838.

  • Guibourg, S., P. Heinrich, and R. Roche, Numerical modeling of the 1995 Chilean tsunami. Impact on French Polynesia, Geophys. Res. Letts., 24, 775–778, 1997.

  • Hayashi, Y., A. Weniza and Y. Fujii, Proposal of New Procedures for Improved Tsunami Forecast by Applying Coastal-to-offshore Tsunami Height Ratio, Proc. Gen. Assemb. Intl. Un. Geod. Geophys., 2924, Melbourne, 2011 [abstract].

  • Hébert, H., P. Heinrich, F. Schindelé, and A. Piatanesi, Far-field simulation of tsunami propagation in the Pacific Ocean; impact on the Marquesas Islands (French Polynesia), J. Geophys. Res., 106, 9161–9177, 2001.

  • Hébert, H., D. Reymond, and E. Okal, Towards a simple quantification of far-field tsunami amplitudes from parameters of the seismic source, Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 90(53), OS32A-03, 2009 [abstract].

  • Heinloo, A. and C. Trabant, SeisComP 2.1 Manual, GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, 35 pp., 2004.

  • Koper, K.D., A.R. Hutko, T. Lay, C.J. Ammon, and H. Kanamori, Frequency-dependent rupture process of the 2001 M w  = 9.0 Tohoku earthquake; Comparison of short-period P wave backprojection images and broadband seismic rupture models, Earth, Planets, Space, 63, 599–602, 2011.

  • Newman, A.V., and E.A. Okal, Teleseismic estimates of radiated seismic energy: The E/M 0 discriminant for tsunami earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 26885–26898, 1998.

  • Ni, S., H. Kanamori, and D.V. Helmberger, Energy radiation from the Sumatra earthquake, Nature, 434, 582, 2005.

  • Okal, E.A., WM m : An extension of the concept of mantle magnitude to the W phase, with application to real-time assessment of the ultra-long component of the seismic source, Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 74(43), 344, 1993 [abstract].

  • Okal, E.A., Performance of robust source estimators for last year’s large earthquakes, Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 88(52), S44A-01, 2007 [abstract].

  • Okal, E.A., WM m : A quick-and-dirty magnitude approach to quantifying the W phase, Eos, Trans. Amer. Un., 89(23), T33A-06, 2008 [abstract].

  • Okal, E.A., From 3-Hz P waves to 0 S 2: Real-time and deferred estimates of the moment of the Honshu event across the full frequency spectrum, Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 92,(53), U51B-09, 2011 [abstract].

  • Okal, E.A., and H. Hébert, Far-field modeling of the 1946 Aleutian tsunami, Geophys. J. Intl., 169, 1229–1238, 2007.

  • Okal, E.A., and J. Talandier, M m : A variable period mantle magnitude, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4169–4193, 1989.

  • Okal, E.A., C.E. Synolakis, G.J. Fryer, P. Heinrich, J.C. Borrero, C. Ruscher, D. Arcas, G. Guille, and D. Rousseau, A field survey of the 1946 Aleutian tsunami in the far field, Seismol. Res. Letts., 73, 490–503, 2002.

  • Okal, E.A., A. Sladen, and E.A.-S. Okal, Rodrigues, Mauritius and Réunion Islands field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Earthquake Spectra, 22, S241–S261, 2006a.

  • Okal, E.A., H.M. Fritz, R. Raveloson, G. Joelson, P. Pančošková, and G. Rambolamanana, Madagascar field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Earthquake Spectra, 22, S263–S283, 2006b.

  • Okal, E.A., H.M. Fritz, and A. Sladen, 2004 Sumatra tsunami surveys in the Comoro Islands and Tanzania and regional tsunami hazard from future Sumatra events, South Afr. J. Geol., 112, 343–358, 2009.

  • Okal, E.A., S. Hongsresawat, and S. Stein, Split mode evidence for no ultra-slow component to the source of the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 102, 391–397, 2012.

  • Reymond, D., and E.A. Okal, Preliminary determination of focal mechanisms from the inversion of spectral amplitudes of mantle waves, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 121, 249–271, 2000.

  • Reymond, D., O. Hyvernaud, and J. Talandier, Automatic detection, location and quantification of earthquakes: application to tsunami warning. Pure Appl. Geophys., 135, 361–382, 1991.

  • Reymond, D., E.A. Okal, H. Hébert, and M. Bourdet, Rapid forecast of tsunami wave heights from a database of pre-computed simulations, and application during the 2011 Tohoku tsunami in French Polynesia, Geophys. Res. Letts., in press, 2012.

  • Schindelé, F., D. Reymond, E. Gaucher, and E.A. Okal, Analysis and automatic processing in near-field of the eight 1992-1994 tsunamigenic earthquakes: Improvements in real-time tsunami warning, Pure Applied Geophys., 144, 381–408, 1995.

  • Schlanger, S.O., M.O. Garcia, B.H. Keating, J.J. Naughton, W.W. Sager, J.A. Haggerty, J.A. Philpotts, and R.A. Duncan, Geology and geochronology of the Line Islands, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 11261–11272, 1984.

  • Synolakis, C.E., and E.A. Okal, 1992–2002: Perspective on a decade of post-tsunami surveys, In: Tsunamis: Case studies and recent developments, ed. by K. Satake, Adv. Natur. Technol. Hazards, 23, pp. 1–30, 2005.

  • Titov, V.V., and C.E. Synolakis, Numerical modeling of tidal wave runup, J. Wtrwy. Port Coast. Engng, B124, 157–171, 1998.

  • Turner, D.L., and R.D. Jarrard, K/Ar dating of the Cook Austral Island chain: A test of the hot spot hypothesis, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 12, 187–220, 1982.

  • Uto, K., Y. Yamamoto, M. Sudo, S. Uchimi, O. Ishizuka, T. Kogiso, and T. Tsunakawa, New K-Ar ages of the Society Islands, French Polynesia, and implications for the Society hotspot feature, Earth, Planets, Space, 59, 879–885, 2007.

  • Wessel, P., and W.H.F. Smith, Free software helps map and display data, Eos, Trans. Amer. Un., 72, 441 and 445–446, 1991.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Youne Kiane Wong and Joël Clément for help in the field and Hélène Hébert and Sébastien Allgeyer for collaboration, notably regarding the response of the Puamau Bay. EAO acknowledges field work support from the Vice-President for Research, Northwestern University. We thank Stuart Weinstein and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments. Maps were plotted using the GMT software (Wessel and Smith, 1991).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile A. Okal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reymond, D., Hyvernaud, O. & Okal, E.A. The 2010 and 2011 Tsunamis in French Polynesia: Operational Aspects and Field Surveys. Pure Appl. Geophys. 170, 1169–1187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0485-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0485-5

Keywords

Navigation