Skip to main content
Log in

Competition and facilitation between germlings of Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competitive interactions between germlings of Ascophyllum nodosum (L) Le Jolis and Fucus vesiculosus L. were studied both in the laboratory and on a shore of the Isle of Man, in the Irish Sea. Both intra- and interspecific competition were investigated by comparing the performance of algal germlings both in monocultures and mixed populations of the two species. The growth of germlings of both species reduced with increasing density. F. vesiculosus always grew faster than Ascophyllum and did best in mixed cultures, whereas Ascophyllum did least well when mixed with Fucus germlings. Clearly the adverse effects of F. vesiculosus on A. nodosum were greater than those of Ascophyllum cohorts. At the same total density, the survival and growth of Ascophyllum declined with an increasing proportion of Fucus germlings, implying that poor recruitment of A. nodosum results from strong competition with F. vesiculosus. However, under desiccation stress on the shore, F. vesiculosus enhanced the survival of A. nodosum at the early germling stage even though competition may occur again at the late stage. Thus, whether interactions between germlings take the form of competition or facilitation depends on the environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew NL, Viejo RM (1998) Effects of wave exposure and intraspecific density on the growth and survivorship of Sargassum muticum (Sargassaceae: Phaeophyta). Eur J Phycol 33:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang PO, DeWreede RE (1992) Density-dependence in a population of Fucus distichus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 90:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology: individuals, population and communities, 1st edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  • Bertness MD, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH (1996) Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. Ecology 77:2130–2141

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO (1990a) Effects of grazing, canopy cover and substratum type on the abundance of common species of seaweeds inhabiting littoral fringe tide pools. Bot Mar 33:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO (1990b) Competitive interaction between Fucus spiralis L. and F. vesiculosus L. (Fucales, Phaeophyta). Hydrobiologia 204/205:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO (1995) Functional ecology of fucoid algae: twenty-three years of progress. Phycologia 34:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organisation. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R (1991) Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol 5:664–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R (1996) Design and interpretation of interference studies: are some methods totally unacceptable? NZ J Forest Sci 26:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC (1993) Intraspecific competition in seaweeds. PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Kain JM (1996) Are neighbours harmful or helpful in Fucus vesiculosus populations? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 133:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Kain JM (1997) Intraspecific competition in Fucus serratus germlings: the interaction of light, nutrients and density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212: 211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David PK (1943) Studies in the autecology of Ascophyllum nodosum. J Ecol 31:178–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon SR, Davison IR, Vadas RL (1990) Freezing tolerance in the intertidal red algae Chondrus crispus and Mastocarpus stellatus: relative importance of acclimation and adaptation. Mar Biol 106:427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo MAde O, Kain JM, Norton TA (1996) Biotic interactions in the colonization of crustose coralline algae by epiphytes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 199:303–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster MS (1975) Regulation of algal community development in a Macrocystis pyrifera forest. Mar Biol 32:331–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2000) Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants: an analytical perspective. J Ecol 88:386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Scheiner SM (1993) ANOVA and ANOCOVA: field competition experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 69–93

  • Harris LG, Ebeling AW, Laur DR, Rowley RJ (1984) Community recovery after damage: a case of facilitation in primary succession. Science 224:1336–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruby T, Norton TA (1979) Algal colonization on rocky shores in the Firth of Clyde. J Ecol 67:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins SR, Norton TA, Hawkins SJ (1999) Interactions between canopy forming algae in the eulittoral zone of sheltered rocky shores on the Isle of Man. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:41–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen HW, Austin LF (1970) Growth rates in the articulated coralline Calliarthron (Rhodophyta). Can J Bot 48:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MP, Hawkins SJ, Hartnoll RG, Norton TA (1998) The establishment of fucoid zonation on algal-dominated rocky shores: hypotheses derived from a simulation model. Funct Ecol 12:259–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain JM (1964) Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. III. Survival and growth of gametophytes. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 44:415–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Karez R, Chapman ARO (1998) A competitive hierarchy model integrating roles of physiological competence and competitive ability does not provide a mechanistic explanation for the zonation of three intertidal Fucus species in Europe. Oikos 81:471–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1989) Competition. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight M, Parke M (1950) A biological study of Fucus vesiculosus L. and F. serratus L. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 29:439–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1986) Relative importance of competition and predation: early colonization by seaweeds in New England. In: Diamond YJ, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 537–555

  • Norton TA (1983) The resistance to dislodgment of Sargassum muticum germlings under defined hydrodynamic conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 63:181–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton TA (1986) The ecology of macroalgae in the Firth of Clyde. Proc R Soc Edinb 90:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson GA, Evans LV (1990) Settlement and survival of Polysiphonia lanosa (Ceramiales) spores on Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus (Fucales). J Phycol 26:597–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramon E (1973) Germination and attachment of zygotes of Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F. Gray. J Phycol 9:445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DC (1990) The effects of variable settlement and early competition on patterns of kelp recruitment. Ecology 71:776–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DC, Neushul M, Ebeling AW (1991) Role of settlement density on gametophyte growth and reproduction in the kelps Pterygophora californica and Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyceae). J Phycol 27:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonbeck MW, Norton TA (1978) Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 31:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

  • Sousa WP (1979) Experimental investigation of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 49:227–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1986) The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (ed) Community ecology: pattern and process, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 240–268

  • Vadas RL, Wright WA, Miller SL (1990) Recruitment of Ascophyllum nodosum: wave action as a source of mortality. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas RL, Johnson S, Norton TA (1992) Recruitment and mortality of early post-settlement stages of benthic algae. Br Phycol J 27:331–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Chapman ARO (1998) Relative effects of elevated grazing pressure and competition from a red algal turf on two post-settlement stages of Fucus evanescens C. Ag. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that improved the manuscript. This work was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2002-002-C00089).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Gil Choi.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, H.G., Norton, T.A. Competition and facilitation between germlings of Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus. Marine Biology 147, 525–532 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-1593-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-1593-x

Keywords

Navigation