Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative vulnerability to predators, and induced defense responses, of eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica and non-native Crassostrea ariakensis oysters in Chesapeake Bay

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management agencies are considering introducing the Suminoe oyster Crassostrea ariakensis into Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is unknown if the growth of feral populations of this non-native oyster would be regulated by the same predators that once controlled the abundance of the native eastern oyster C. virginica. In laboratory studies, we compared the relative susceptibility of juvenile diploids (shell height < 25 mm) of both oyster species to invertebrate predators of eastern oyster juveniles. Predators included four species of mud crabs [Rhithropanopeus harrisii (carapace width 7–11 mm), Eurypanopeus depressus (6–21 mm), Dyspanopeus sayi (8–20 mm), and Panopeus herbstii (9–29 mm)], the blue crab Callinectes sapidus (35–65 mm), and two sizes of polyclad flatworms (Stylochus ellipticus and possibly Euplana gracilis; planar area ≲5 mm2 and ∼14 to 88 mm2). All four species of mud crab and the blue crab preyed significantly (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) more on C. ariakensis than on C. virginica, but predation by flatworms of both sizes did not differ significantly between oyster species. The greater susceptibility of C. ariakensis to crab predation was likely due to its shell compression strength being 64% lower than that of C. virginica (P = 0.005). To test for predator-induced enhancement of shell strength, we held oysters of both species for 54 days in the presence of, but protected from, C. sapidus and R. harrisii. Crabs were fed congeneric oysters twice weekly within each aquarium. Compared to controls, shell strength of C. virginica exposed to R. harrisii increased significantly (P < 0.043), as did shell strength of both oyster species exposed to C. sapidus (P < 0.01). Despite the changes in shell strength by both oyster species in the presence of C. sapidus, the shell of C. ariakensis remained 57% weaker than C. virginica. We conclude that, because C. ariakensis exposed to predators continued to have a weaker shell relative to C. virginica, the natural suite of crab and flatworm predators in Chesapeake Bay will likely serve to control the abundance of feral C. ariakensis. We caution that the situation in the natural environment may be sufficiently different in some locations that C. ariakensis may be able to compensate for its greater vulnerability to crab predation and hence become a nuisance species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbe GR, Breitburg DL (1992) The influence of oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) and crabs (Callinectes sapidus and Xanthidae) on survival of oyster (Crassostrea virginica) spat in Chesapeake Bay: does spat protection always work? Aquaculture 107:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SK (2005) Stalemate over the new oyster. Va Mar Res Bull 37:2–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen SK, Downing SL (1986) Performance of triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg). 1. Survival, growth, glycogen-content, and sexual maturation in yearlings. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 102:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop MJ, Peterson CH (2006) When r-selection may not predict introduced-species proliferation: predation of a non-native oyster. Ecol Appl 16:718–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisker R, Castagna M (1987) Predation on single spat oysters Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin) by blue crabs Callinectes sapidus Rathbun and mud crabs Panopeus herbstii Milne-Edwards. J Shellfish Res 6:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese WP, Malouf RE (1977) Hatchery rearing techniques for the oyster Crassostrea rivularis Gould. Aquaculture 12:123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1999) Molluscan invasions in marine and estuarine communities. Malacologia 41:439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT, Thompson JK, Schemel LE, Nichols FH (1990) Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, USA) by the Asian clam Potamacorbula amurensis. I. Introduction and dispersal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 66:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriker MR (1996) The shell and ligament. In: Kennedy VS, Newell RIE, Eble AF (eds) The eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, pp 75–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JG (1980) Environmental and biological controls of bivalve shell mineralogy and microstructure. In: Rhoads DC, Lutz RA (eds) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms: biological records of environmental change. Plenum Press, New York, pp 69–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SG, Lam S, Gao QF, Mak KK, Shin PKS (2004) Induced anti-predator responses of the green mussel, Perna viridis (L.), on exposure to the predatory gastropod, Thais clavigera Küster, and the swimming crab, Thalamita danae Stimpson. Mar Biol 144:675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen DJ (1973) Prey preference of Stylochus ellipticus in Chesapeake Bay. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 63:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern JE (1982) Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in South San Francisco Bay? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston DB (1990) Foraging behavior of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, on juvenile oysters, Crassostrea virginica: effects of prey density and size. Bull Mar Sci 46:62–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford SE, Tripp MR (1996) Diseases and defense mechanisms. In: Kennedy VS, Newell RIE, Eble AF (eds) The eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, pp 581–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulletquer P, Wolowicz M (1989) The shell of Cardium edule, Cardium glaucum and Ruditapes philippinarum: organic content, composition and energy value, as determined by different methods. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 69:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare MP, Palumbi SR, Butman CA (2000) Single-step species identification of bivalve larvae using multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Mar Biol 137:953–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy VS (1996) Biology of larvae and spat. In: Kennedy VS, Newell RIE, Eble AF (eds) The eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, pp 371–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy VS, Breisch LL (1983) Sixteen decades of political management of the oyster fishery in Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay. J Environ Manage 16:153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer WJ, Gartside E, Orsi JJ (1994) Predation by an introduced clam as the likely cause of substantial declines in zooplankton in San Francisco Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 113:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz GE, Chamberlin JV (1978) Blue crab predation on cultchless oyster spat. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 68:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Landers WS, Rhodes EW (1970) Some factors influencing predation by the flatworm, Stylochus ellipticus (Girard), on oysters. Chesapeake Sci 11:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Siripattrawan S, Ituarte CF, Ó Foighil D (2005) Invasion of the clonal clams: Corbicula lineages in the New World. Am Malacol Bull 20:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard GH, Bertness MD, Yund PO (1999) Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology 80:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff VL (1956) Two obscure oyster enemies in New England waters. Science 123:1119–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott JJ, Flower FB (1953) Preliminary studies of the common mud crabs on oyster beds of Delaware Bay. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 1952:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Milke LM, Kennedy VS (2001) Mud crabs (Xanthidae) in Chesapeake Bay: claw characteristics and predation on epifaunal bivalves. Invert Biol 120:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (1993) Zebra mussels. Biology, impacts, and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell RIE, Alspach GS, Kennedy VS, Jacobs D (2000) Mortality of newly metamorphosed eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) in mesohaline Chesapeake Bay. Mar Biol 136:665–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell RIE, Fisher TR, Holyoke RR, Cornwell JC (2005) Influence of eastern oysters on nitrogen and phosphorus regeneration in Chesapeake Bay, USA. In: Dame R, Olenin S (eds) The comparative roles of suspension feeders in ecosystems, vol 47. NATO Science Series: IV—Earth and environmental sciences. Springer, Netherlands, pp 93–120

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2004) Nonnative oysters in the Chesapeake Bay. The National Academies Press, Washington, District of Columbia

  • Osman RW, Abbe GR (1994) Post-settlement factors affecting oyster recruitment in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. In: Dyer K, Orth RJ (eds) Changes in fluxes in estuaries: implications from science to management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, pp 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR (1981) Do carbonate skeletons limit the rate of body growth? Nature 292:150–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prezant RS, Chapman EJ, McDougall A (2006) In utero predator-induced responses in the viviparid snail Bellamya chinensis. Can J Zool 84:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price J, Thayer GW, LaCroix MW, Montgomery GP (1976) The organic content of shells and soft tissues of selected estuarine gastropods and pelecypods. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 65:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer O, Harms-Ringdahl S (2001) Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea. Mar Biol 139:959–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruther J, Meiners T, Steidle JLM (2002) Rich in phenomena—lacking in terms. A classification of kairomones. Chemoecology 12:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed R, Hughes RN (1995) Criteria for prey size-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 193:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed R, Suchanek TH (1992) Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In: Gosling E (ed) The Mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJF (1992) Alarm signals in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2:33–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LD, Jennings JA (2000) Induced defensive responses by the bivalve Mytilus edulis to predators with different attack modes. Mar Biol 136:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabell OB, Ogbebo F, Primicerio R (2003) Inducible defences in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators. Chem Senses 28:141–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Findlay S, Pace ML (1999) Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. A case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. Bioscience 49:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JD, Layman M (1972) The mechanical properties of bivalve (Mollusca) shell structures. Paleontology 15:73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson TG, Chow TJ (1955) The strontium-calcium atom ratio in carbonate-secreting marine organisms. Deep Sea Res 3(suppl):20–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster JR, Medford RZ (1961) Flatworm distribution and associated oyster mortality in Chesapeake Bay. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 50:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • White ME, Wilson EA (1996) Predators, pests, and competitors. In: Kennedy VS, Newell RIE, Eble AF (eds) The eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, pp 559–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Allen SK (2003) A review of published work on Crassostrea ariakensis. J Shellfish Res 22:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuschin M, Stanton RJ (2001) Experimental measurement of shell strength and its taphonomic interpretation. Palaios 16:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ed Jones (Taylor Shellfish) for providing Suminoe oyster larvae; Mark Luckenbach (Virginia Institute for Marine Science) for providing eastern oyster larvae; Melissa Radcliffe (Horn Point Laboratory) for supplying cultured microalgae; John Thiravong (University of Delaware Center for Composite Materials) for providing technical assistance with the Instron instrument; Matt Hare (University of Maryland College Park) for performing genetic analysis for oyster species identification; Angela Freeman for initial technical assistance; George Abbe, Don Boesch, and Robert Prezant and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. This research was supported by award NA16RG2207/07-5-28068J from Maryland Sea Grant, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and award NA04NMF4570425 from NMFS-NOAA non-native oyster research program. The experiments reported herein comply with the current laws of the USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger I. E. Newell.

Additional information

Communicated by R.J. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, R.I.E., Kennedy, V.S. & Shaw, K.S. Comparative vulnerability to predators, and induced defense responses, of eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica and non-native Crassostrea ariakensis oysters in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Biol 152, 449–460 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0706-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0706-0

Keywords

Navigation