Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measures of fish abundance, assemblage composition and length were compared when sampled by baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo BRUV) and diver-operated stereo-video transects (stereo DOV) at the Houtman Abrolhos Islands and Ningaloo Reef. Species richness counts were 40% higher on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV. Stereo BRUVs also recorded a greater number of large-bodied targeted species in higher abundance than stereo DOV (e.g. Lethrinus nebulosus, Plectropomus leopardus) at the Houtman Abrolhos and at Ningaloo Reef. Many non-targeted species were also recorded in greater abundances on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV (e.g. Coris auricularis, Gymnothorax spp). Stereo DOV transects recorded a greater abundance of some small-bodied Pomacentridae, Labridae and Scaridae species than did stereo BRUV, particularly at Ningaloo Reef. This study demonstrates that choice of sampling technique for surveys of reef fish can lead to very different biological interpretations of fish assemblage structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalised discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust NZ J Stat 45:301–318. doi:10.111/1467-842X.00285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principle coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecol 82:511–525. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew NL, Mapstone BD (1987) Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:39–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappo M, Speare P, Wassenberg TJ, Harvey E, Rees M, Heyward A, Pitcher R (2001) Use of baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) to survey demersal fish—how deep and meaningful? In: Harvey ES, Cappo M (eds) Video sensing of the size frequency and abundance of target and non-target fauna in Australian fisheries—a national workshop. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Australia, pp 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappo M, Speare P, De’ath G (2004) Comparison of baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) and prawn trawls for assessments of fish biodiversity in inter reefal areas of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302:123–152. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CJ, Atkinson RJA (1986) Fish behaviour in relation to divers. Prog Underw Sci 11:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CJ, Johnston ADF, Dunn JR, Creasey DJ (1974) Reactions of fish to sound generated by diver’s open-circuit underwater breathing apparatus. Mar Biol 27:357–366. doi:10.1007/BF00394372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RG (1994) Abundance, size structure, and diver-oriented behaviour of three large benthic carnivorous fishes in a marine reserve in northeastern New Zealand. Biol Conserv 70:93–99. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)90276-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RG, Syms C, Davey NK, Gust N, Notman P, Stewart R, Radford CA, Carbines G, Carr MH, Jevs AG (2007) Does breathing apparatus affect fish counts and observations? A comparison at three New Zealand fished and protected areas. Mar Biol 150:1379–1395. doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0420-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman N, Harvey E, Kendrick G (2003) Differences in fish assemblages from different reef habitats at Hamelin Bay, south-western Australia. Mar Freshw Res 54:177–184. doi:10.1071/MF02040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmelin-Vivien ML, Harmelin JG, Chauvet C, Duval C, Galzin R, Lejeune P, Barnabe G, Blanc F, Chevalier R, Duclerc J, Lasserre G (1985) The underwater observation of fish communities and fish populations—methods and problems. Rev Ecol Terr Vie 40:466–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey ES, Shortis MR (1996) A system for stereo-video measurement of subtidal organisms. Mar Tech Soc J 29:10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey ES, Shortis MR (1998) Calibration stability of an underwater stereo-video system: implications for measurement accuracy and precision. Mar Tech Soc J 329:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001a) A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001b) Improving the statistical power of length estimates of reef fish: a comparison of estimates determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99:72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2002) Estimation of reef fish length by divers and by stereo-video: a first comparison of the accuracy and precision in the field on living fish under operational conditions. Fish Res 57:255–265. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00356-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis MR, Kendrick GA (2004) A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by SCUBA divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Mar Freshw Res 55:573–580. doi:10.1071/MF03130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey ES, Cappo M, Butler J, Hall N, Kendrick GA (2007) Bait attraction effects the performance of remote underwater video stations in assessment of demersal fish community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:245–254. doi:10.3354/meps07192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford MJ (1992) Spatial and temporal variation in predation on reef fishes by coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus, Serranidae). Coral Reefs 11:193–198. doi:10.1007/BF00301993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand Y (1957) Light, colour and vision. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln-Smith MP (1989) Improving multispecies rocky reef fish censuses by counting different groups of species using different procedures. Environ Biol Fish 26:29–37. doi:10.1007/BF00002473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro JL (1974) Mode of operation of antillean fish traps and relationships between ingress, escapement, catch and soak. J Couseil 35:337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Priede IG, Bagley PM, Smith A, Creasey S, Merrett NR (1994) Scavenging deep demersal fishes of the Porcupine Seabight, North-east Atlantic: observations by baited camera, trap and trawl. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:481–498. doi:10.1017/S0025315400047615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham D, Underwood AJ, Chapman AG, Gray CA (2007) A strategy for developing scientific sampling tools for fishery-independent surveys of estuarine fish in New South Wales, Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 64:1512–1516. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsm096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilys MA, Carlos G (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 57:289–304. doi:10.1023/A:1007679109359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SL, Solonsky AC (1986) Comparison of a rapid visual and strip transect technique for censusing reef fish assemblages. Bull Mar Sci 39:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer ML, Stoner AW, Ryer CH, Munk JE (2005) A towed camera sled for estimating abundance of juvenile flatfishes and habitat characteristics: comparison with beam trawls and divers. Est Coast Shelf Sci 64:497–503. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St John J (1999) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of the coral reef grouper Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae): patterns in taxa, size and habitat of prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:233–246. doi:10.3354/meps180233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart BD, Beukers JS (2000) Baited technique improves censuses of cryptic fish in complex habitats. Mar Ecol Pro Ser 197:259–272. doi:10.3354/meps197259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE, Gunn JS (1986) Comparative analysis of visual census techniques for highly mobile, reef associated piscivores (Carangidae). Environ Biol Fishes 17:93–116. doi:10.1007/BF00001740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkel VM, Lorance P, Mahévas S (2004) Do visual transects provide true population estimates for deepwater fish? ICES J Mar Sci 61:1050–1056. doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DL (2006) Use of underwater stereo-video to measure fish assemblage structure, spatial distribution of fishes and change in assemblages with protection from fishing. Dissertation, The University of Western Australia

  • Watson DL, Harvey ES (2007) Behaviour of temperate and sub-tropical reef fishes towards a stationary SCUBA diver. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 40:85–103. doi:10.1080/10236240701393263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DL, Harvey ES, Anderson MJ, Kendrick GA (2005) A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar Biol 148:415–425. doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0090-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DL, Harvey ES, Kendrick GA, Nardi K, Anderson MJ (2007) Protection from fishing alters the species composition of fish assemblages in a temperate-tropical transition zone. Mar Biol 152:1197–1206. doi:10.1007/s00227-007-0767-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Babcock RC (2000) A baited underwater video system for the detection of relative density of carnivorous reef fish. Mar Freshw Res 51:755–763. doi:10.1071/MF00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Millar RB, Babcock RC (2000) Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes: comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater video. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 198:249–260. doi:10.3354/meps198249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with logistical assistance from the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. Financial assistance was received from The University of Western Australia and from the Australian Government through the Northern Agricultural Catchment Council (NACC). This study forms part of a Western Australian Marine Science Institution (WAMSI) project to assist with the implementation of an Ecosystem Approach to the management of fisheries resources. We would like to thank SONY Australia and R. Scott in the UWA workshop for construction of the stereo-video systems. We greatly appreciate the help by Dr. B. Hutchins in identifying numerous fish species.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianne L. Watson.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Goulet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, D.L., Harvey, E.S., Fitzpatrick, B.M. et al. Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare?. Mar Biol 157, 1237–1250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-010-1404-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-010-1404-x

Keywords

Navigation