Skip to main content
Log in

Primary versus secondary drivers of foraging activity in sandeel schools (Ammodytes tobianus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The commercially and ecologically valuable sandeel (Ammodytes ssp.) make distinct vertical shifts between an inactive stage, during which they seek refuge in the sand, and a pelagic schooling stage, during which they forage. This characteristic discontinuous foraging pattern constitutes a challenge to fishery biologists and has consequences for a wide range of predators ranging from birds and mammals to commercially important species. However, experimental studies that shed light on the primary drivers of foraging activity in fish are rare. In the present study, whole schools of sandeel (A. tobianus) were caught in August in east Denmark (65°02′30N; 12°37′00E) and kept in large tanks in the laboratory. It was found that the amount of food ingested and memory of past days feeding history are primary drivers of foraging activity at the level of the entire school, whereas external factors such as prey concentration and temperature are merely secondary drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrens JW, Petersen JK, AErtebjerg G, Steffensen JF (2010) Influence of moderate and severe hypoxia on the diurnal activity pattern of lesser sandeel Ammodytes tobianus. J Fish Biol 77:538–551

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohl E (1980) Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding in planktivorous fish. Oecologia 44:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boujard T, Leatherland JF (1992) Circadian-rhythms and feeding time in fishes. Environ Biol Fish 35:109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremset G (2000) Seasonal and diel changes in behaviour, microhabitat use and preferences by young pool-dwelling Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and brown trout, Salmo trutta. Environ Biol Fish 59:163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale M, Casini M, Arrhenius F, Hakansson N (2003) Diel spatial distribution and feeding activity of herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the Baltic Sea. Aquat Liv Res 16:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbyson E, Swain DP, Chabot D, Castonguay M (2003) Diel variation in feeding rate and prey composition of herring and mackerel in the southern Gulf of St Lawrence. J Fish Biol 63:1235–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drickamer LC, Gillie LL (1998) Integrating proximate and ultimate causation in the study of vertebrate behavior: methods considerations. Am Zool 38:43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhard GH, van der Kooij J, Bell ED, Pinnegar JK, Blanchard JL, Mackinson S, Righton DA (2008) Fishing mortality versus natural predation on diurnally migrating sandeels Ammodytes marinus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 369:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Mackinson S, Flatt R (2004) Diel patterns in the habitat utilisation of sandeels revealed using integrated acoustic surveys. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW (2002) Management implications of interactions between fisheries and sandeel-dependent seabirds and seals in the North Sea. Ices J Mar Sci 59:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giske J, Mangel M, Jakobsen P, Huse G, Wilcox C, Strand E (2003) Explicit trade-off rules in proximate adaptive agents. Evol Ecol Res 5:835–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstreet SPR, Armstrong E, Mosegaard H, Jensen H, Gibb IM, Fraser HM, Scott BE, Holland GJ, Sharples J (2006) Variation in the abundance of sandeels Ammodytes marinus off southeast Scotland: an evaluation of area-closure fisheries management and stock abundance assessment methods. Ices J Mar Sci 63:1530–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson ES (1986) Predation on the Pacific Sand Lance, Ammodytes hexapterus (Pisces, Ammodytidae), during the transition between day and night in Southeastern Alaska. Copeia 1986(1):223–226

  • Loekkeborg S (1998) Feeding behaviour of cod, Gadus morhua: activity rhythm and chemically mediated food search. Anim Behav 56:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macer CT (1966) Sandeels (Ammodytidae) in the south-western North Sea: their biology and fishery. MAFF Fish Invest Lond Ser II 24:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand F, Magnan P, Boisclair D (2002) Water temperature, light intensity and zooplankton density and the feeding activity of juvenile brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Freshw Biol 47:2153–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson LAF, Thygesen UH, Lundgren B, Nielsen BF, Nielsen JR, Beyer JE (2003) Vertical migration and dispersion of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and herring (Clupea harengus) schools at dusk in the Baltic Sea. Aquat Liv Res 16:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rands SA, Cowlishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA (2003) Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature 423:432–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rindorf A, Wanless S, Harris MP (2000) Effects of changes in sandeel availability on the reproductive output of seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvanes AGV, Hart PJB (1998) Individual variability in state-dependent feeding behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav 55:1349–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm S (1989) Importance of energy costs in central place foraging by hummingbirds. Ecology 70:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdimarsson SK, Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE, Huntingford FA (1997) Seasonal changes in sheltering: effect of light and temperature on diel activity in juvenile salmon. Anim Behav 54:1405–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Kooij J, Scott BE, Mackinson S (2008) The effects of environmental factors on daytime sandeel distribution and abundance on the Dogger Bank. J Sea Res 60:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk PLM, Staaks G, Hardewig I (2002) The effect of fasting and refeeding on temperature preference, activity and growth of roach, Rutilus rutilus. Oecologia 130:496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslade P (1974a) Behavioral-studies on lesser sandeel ammodytes marinus (Raitt).3. Effect of temperature on activity and environmental-control of annual cycle of activity. J Fish Biol 6:587–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslade P (1974b) Behavioral-studies on lesser sandeel ammodytes marinus (Raitt).1. Effect of food availability on activity and role of olfaction in food detection. J Fish Biol 6:565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslade P (1974c) Behavioral-studies on lesser sandeel ammodytes marinus (Raitt).2. Effect of light-intensity on activity. J Fish Biol 6:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All experiments were carried out in line with ethical guidelines on animal handling. We thank the two reviewers for their thorough and constructive critique, the personal at the Øresund Aquarium for helping us with catching and caretaking of sandeels and Ken Haste Andersen and Uffe Høgsbro Thygesen for help with MATLAB programming. MVD was funded by the Danish Research Council supported projects FISHNET and SLIP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael van Deurs.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Harrod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Deurs, M., Behrens, J.W., Warnar, T. et al. Primary versus secondary drivers of foraging activity in sandeel schools (Ammodytes tobianus). Mar Biol 158, 1781–1789 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1691-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1691-x

Keywords

Navigation