Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Business and Human Rights in South Africa: An Analysis of Antecedents of Human Rights Due Diligence

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present article is to analyse South African listed companies’ public reporting in order to contribute to our understanding of how and why companies consider human rights. The empirical analysis is placed in the context of the increasing prominence of human rights as a business issue, premised in part on the activities of the United Nations (UN) Special Representative of the Secretary General (SRSG) on human rights and business. On the basis of a content analysis of the public reports of the top 100 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), we test hypotheses focused on the antecedents of companies’ demonstrated human rights due diligence, with particular reference to assumptions or findings of the SRSG and institutional theory. Some of our results are unexpected: there is little influence exerted by the sector and size of companies in our sample, and there is also an unexpectedly insignificant impact of company participation in the UN Global Compact and the JSE Socially Responsible Investment Index. On the other hand, a key predictor of human rights due diligence is an explicit leadership commitment, and important roles are also played by government regulations and stock exchange listing rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Anglo Platinum: 2006, Anglo Platinum Sustainability Report 2006 (Anglo Platinum, Johannesburg)

  • Bansal, P. and Roth, K.: 2000, ‘Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilchitz, D.: 2008, ‘Project on Business and Human Rights: Baseline Report’, unpublished report, South African Institute for Advanced Constitutional, Human Rights and International Law, Pretoria

  • Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR): 2008, ‘Initial statement by the Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR) in Response to the 2008 Report of the UN Special Representative on Business and Human Rights’, http://www.blihr.org. Accessed July 2008

  • Chandler, G.: 2008, ‘Business and Human Rights: Ruggie Report – Finally, Let the Real Work Begin’, Ethical Corporation, June 2 2008, http://www.ethicalcorp.com. Accessed July 2008

  • Corpwatch: 2002, Greenwash +10: The UN’s Global Compact, Corporate Accountability and the Johannesburg Summit (Corpwatch, San Francisco)

  • DIHR (Danish Institute for Human Rights): 2006, Human Rights and Business Project: South Africa Country Risk Assessment (Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • DIHR/HRBSA (Danish Institute for Human Rights and Human Rights and Business Project South Africa): 2008, Masizibheke: Let’s look at ourselves: Human Rights Compliance Assessment for South Africa (Human Rights and Business Project South Africa, Johannesburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, C. and Ngunjiri, F. W.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in South Africa: A Descriptive and Comparative Analysis’, Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), 286-307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M.: 2002, ‘The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and the United States: an institutional perspective’, Policy Sciences 35, 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T. and Dunfee, T. W.: 1994, ‘Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory’, Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, N., Hamann, R. and de Jongh, D.: 2008, ‘Corporate Accountability in South Africa,’ in P. Utting (ed.) Taming Corporate Capitalism: New Perspectives on Business Regulation for Sustainable Development (Oxford University Press, New Delhi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelhainz, M. A. and Adams, R. J.: 1999, ‘The Apparel Industry Response to “Sweatshop” Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct’, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 51-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fig, D.: 2005, ‘Manufacturing amnesia: Corporate Social Responsibility in South Africa’, International Affairs, 81(3), 599-617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R.: 2004, ‘Corporate social responsibility, partnerships, and institutional change: The case of mining companies in South Africa’, Natural Resources Forum, 28(4), 278-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R., Khagram, S., and Rohan, S.: 2008, ‘South Africa’s charter approach to socio-economic transformation: Collaborative governance or hardball bargaining?. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(1), 21-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R. and Schild, C.: 2008, Business and Human Rights in South Africa: Context and recommendations for proactive engagement by the National Business Initiative (National Business Initiative, Johannesburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. and Krippendorff, K.: 2007, ‘Answering the call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data’, Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L.: 1999, ‘The Universal Declaration at 50 and the Challenge of Global Markets’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 25, 17-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J.: 1999, ‘Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J.: 2001, ‘Linking organizational and field-level analyses – the diffusion of corporate environmental practice’, Organization and Environment, 14(2), 133–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H.: 2006, ‘Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T.: 1999, ‘The institutional determinants of social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 163-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Corporate Citizenship: 2005, Special Edition on Corporate Citizenship in Africa, edited by W. Visser, C. Middleton and M. McIntosh

  • Kapelus, P., Hamann, R. and O’Keefe, E.: 2009, ‘Doing business with integrity in weak governance zones: Learning from the experience of AngloGold Ashanti in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, International Social Science Journal, 57(s1), 119-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G.: 2005, ‘The Global Compact: Selected Experiences and Reflections’, Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1/2), 69-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M., Koss P., Jones, C. & Ervin, D.: 2007, ‘Motivations for voluntary environmental management’, Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 751-772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A.: 2008, `Sustainability, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Exploring Multinationals' Reporting Practices', Business Strategy and the Environment 17(1), 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. S.: 2003, ‘Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3): 253-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., and Bracken, C. C.: 2002, ‘Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability’, Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., and Ferrell, O. C.: 2001, ‘Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses’, Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 37-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangaliso, M. P.: 1997, ‘South Africa: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Sullivan Principles’, Journal of Black Studies, 28(2), 219-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., M. Akoorie, R. Hamann and P. Sinha: 2009, ‘Environmental Practices in the Wine Industry: An Empirical Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Stakeholder Theory in the United States and New Zealand’, Journal of World Business 45(4), doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.009

  • McWilliams, A., D. Siegel and P. M. Wright: 2006, `Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications', Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W.: 1996, Applied Linear Statistical Models (Irwin, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of South Africa: 2009, ‘Labour Review 2004–2009’, http://www.pmg.org.za/files/docs/090701labourreview.doc.

  • Paul, K. and Aquila, D. A.: 1988, ‘Political consequences of ethical investing: The case of South Africa’, Journal of Business Ethics, 7(9), 691-697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., Roberts, S., and van Sittert, L.: 2007, ‘“Black Economic Empowerment”, Business and the State in South Africa’, Development and Change, 38(5), 933-955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G.J.: 2005, ‘Business ethics and governance in Africa’, Business and Society, 44(1), 94-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2002, ‘The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5, 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2007a, ‘Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Document A/HRC/4/35, 9 February 2007

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2007b, ‘Addendum on Human Rights Policies and Management Practices: Results From Questionnaire Surveys of Governments and the Fortune Global 500 firms’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Document A/HRC/4/35/Add.3, 28 February 2007

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2007c, ‘Addendum on Business Recognition of Human Rights: Global Patterns, Regional and Sectoral Variations’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Document A/HRC/4/35/Add.4, 8 February 2007

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2008a, ‘Protect, Respect, and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Document A/HRC/8/5, 7 April 2008

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2008b, ‘Statement to United Nations Human Rights Council’, 5 June 2008. http://198.170.85.29/Ruggie-statement-mandate-review-5-Jun-2008.doc. Accessed July 2008

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2009, ‘Presentation of Report to United Nations Human Rights Council’, 2 June 2009. http://www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-statement-to-UN-Human-Rights-Council-2-Jun-2009.pdf. Accessed June 2009

  • Scott, W. R.: 1995, Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, G. W.: 2003, ‘Monitoring Multinationals: Lessons from the Anti-Apartheid Era’, Politics & Society, 31(3), 381-406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. and Williams, O. F.: 2000, Economic Imperatives and Ethical Values in Global Business: The South African Experience and International Codes Today (Kluwer, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg, D. and Hamann, R.: 2006, ‘The JSE Socially Responsible Investment Index and the state of sustainability reporting in South Africa’, Development Southern Africa, 23(2), 305-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P., and A. Zammit: 2006, Beyond Pragmatism: Appraising UN–Business Partnerships (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W.: 2005, ‘Corporate citizenship in South Africa: A review of progress since democracy’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18, 29-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H.: 2002, Corporate accountability in search of a treaty? Some insights from foreign direct liability (The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkarib, R., Penttinenc, H. and Tahvanainenc, M.: 2002, ‘Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research’, International Business Review, 11(5), 611-628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Ralph Hamann, Farai Kapfudzaruwa & Christoph Schild

  2. Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Paresha Sinha

Authors
  1. Ralph Hamann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paresha Sinha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Farai Kapfudzaruwa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christoph Schild
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Hamann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamann, R., Sinha, P., Kapfudzaruwa, F. et al. Business and Human Rights in South Africa: An Analysis of Antecedents of Human Rights Due Diligence. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 2), 453–473 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0293-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0293-8

Keywords