Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of groundwater interaction in North American regional climate simulations with WRF/Noah-MP

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fluxes of water and energy between the land surface and atmosphere involve many complex non-linear processes. In this study, the Noah and Noah-MP land surface models with multiple groundwater sub-models are used to assess how the treatment of canopy processes and interactions with deep groundwater affect 6 month regional climate simulations in two contrasting years, 2002 and 2010. Unlike the free drainage models, the models with groundwater capability have upward flux from the aquifer at different periods in the simulation. The inter-model Noah-MP soil moisture and latent heat flux results are consistent with recharge differences: the stronger upward flux capability with interactive groundwater results in the highest soil moisture and latent heat flux of the Noah-MP models. The increased latent heat effect on increased precipitation is small, which may result from negligible differences in convective precipitation. The Noah-MP model, independent of groundwater option, improves upon a cold and dry bias in the spring Noah simulations both during the day and night. The results for summer are region dependent and also differ between year and time of day. For a majority of the simulation period, there is little groundwater effect on the Noah-MP near-surface diagnostic fields. However, when the Noah-MP model produces large warm/dry biases in the 2010 summer, the aquifer interactions in Noah-MP improve the air temperature bias by 1–2 °C and dew point temperature bias by 1 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barthlott C, Kalthoff N (2011) A numerical sensitivity study on the impact of soil moisture on convection-related parameters and convective precipitation over complex terrain. J Atmo Sci 68:2971–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimelow J, Hanesiak J, Burrows W (2011) Impacts of land – atmosphere feedbacks on deep, moist convection on the Canadian prairies. Earth Interact 15:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F et al (2007) Description and evaluation of the characteristics of the NCAR high-resolution land data assimilation system during IHOP-02. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:694–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPC (2013) CPC US Unified Precipitation data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/

  • Dirmeyer P et al (2012) Evidence for enhanced land-atmosphere feedback in a warming climate. J Hydrometeor 13:981–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson IM, Maxwell RM (2010) Role of groundwater in watershed response and land surface feedbacks under climate change. Water Resour Res 46, W00F02. doi:10.1029/2009WR008616

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CR, Wood EF (2011) Observed land–atmosphere coupling from satellite remote sensing and reanalysis. J Hydrometeor 12:1221–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findell K, Gentine P, Lintner B, Kerr C (2011) Probability of afternoon precipitation in eastern United States and Mexico enhanced by high evaporation. Nat Geosci 4:434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Niu G-Y, Yang Z-L (2009) Impacts of vegetation and groundwater dynamics on warm season precipitation over the Central United States. J Geophys Res 114, D06109. doi:10.1029/2008JD010756

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollet SJ, Maxwell RM (2008) Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model. Water Resour Res 44, W02402. doi:10.1029/2007WR006004

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster RD et al (2004) Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Sci 305:1138–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Miller NL (2005) Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model. J Hydrometeorol 6:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM et al (2007) Development of a coupled groundwater – atmosphere model. Mon Weather Rev 139:96–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Chow FK, Kollet SJ (2011) The groundwater land- surface-atmosphere connection: soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations. Adv Wat Resour 30:2447–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., et al (2006) North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87:343–360.

  • Miguez-Macho G, Fan Y (2012) The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 2. Influence on seasonal soil moisture and evapotranspiration. J Geophys Res 117, D15114. doi:10.1029/2012JD017540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguez-Macho G, Fan Y, Weaver CP, Walko R, Robock A (2007) Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 2. Formulation, validation, and soil moisture simulation. J Geophys Res 112, D13108. doi:10.1029/2006JD008112

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centers for Environmental Prediction (2004) NCEP ADP Global Surface Observational Weather Data, retrieved from http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds461.0/

  • Niu G-Y et al (2011) The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J Geophys Res 116, D12109. doi:10.1029/2010JD015139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen R et al (2010) High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: a process study of current and warmer climate. J Clim 24:3015–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schar C, Luthi D, Beyerle U (1999) The soil-precipitation feedback: a process study with a regional climate model. J Clim 12:722–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuffert G, Gross P, Simmer C (2002) The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrologic model. J Hydrometeorol 3:505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda M, Huang X.-Y, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR Technical Note, p 384

  • Trier S, Chen F, Manning K, LeMone MA, Davis C (2008) Sensitivity of the simulated PBL and precipitation to land surface conditions for a 12-Day warm-season convection period in the Central United State. Mon Weather Rev 136:2321–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaitchik B, Santanello J, Kumar S, Peters-Lidard C (2013) Representation of soil moisture feedbacks during drought in NASA Unified WRF. J Hydrometeor 14:360–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Barlage M, Castro C, Fling K (2010) Comparison of land–precipitation coupling strength using observations and models. J Hydrometeor 11:979–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research support was provided through grants from the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (Grant no. NA13NES4400003) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (MAPP-CTB grant no. NA14OAR4310186).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Barlage.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on “Regional Earth System Modeling” edited by Zong-Liang Yang and Congbin Fu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 831 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barlage, M., Tewari, M., Chen, F. et al. The effect of groundwater interaction in North American regional climate simulations with WRF/Noah-MP. Climatic Change 129, 485–498 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1308-8

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Gonzalo Miguez-Macho