Skip to main content
Log in

The AB Identification Survey: Identifying Absolute versus Relative Determinants of Happiness

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces a simple survey method to distinguish between two types of variables that affect happiness—type A, which exerts an absolute effect on happiness, and type B, which affects happiness only through social context. The authors validate the method by comparing its findings with the findings of a theoretically superior but less practical experimental method, and use the method to identify the AB nature of a variety of naturally-occurring variables among both college students and people with work experience. We conclude by discussing the limitation of this method as well as its potential to inform policymakers about where to invest resources in order to improve people’s happiness over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To improve a variable means to change it toward the more desired direction and does not necessarily mean to increase its value. For example, to improve the weight of a laptop computer generally means to decrease the weight.

  2. To make the simulated-non-comparative version parallel to the comparative version, we should have asked respondents to suppose that “the average height of men were the same as your height.” rather than to suppose that “every man were of your height.” However, pilot tests found that the two questions produced similar results and the “every man” question was easier to understand than the “average height of men” question.

  3. Because we randomly assigned respondents to the better and the worse conditions, X values were discrete, and theoretically, using regression parameters to calculate AB coefficient is equivalent to using mean differences to calculate AB coefficient. Namely, AB coefficient = βnon-comparativecomparative = (hnon-comparative(x1) − hnon-comparative(x2))/(hcomparative (x1) − hcomparative(x2)). Compare this equation with Eq. 1 and the reader will realize that the only difference between ABIS and the experimental method is that ABIS uses simulated-non-comparative means to calculate the non-comparative effect and the experimental method uses real non-comparative means.

  4. In earlier research (Hsee et al. 2009), the authors also investigated whether people could distinguish between type A and type B variables intuitively. In their research they first explained the definitions of type A and type B variables to research participants and then asked the respondents to rate diamond size and bathwater temperature on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (“definitely belongs to type A”) to 4 (“definitely belongs to type B”). Again, the results were in the expected direction (mean ratings were = 1.50 and 3.22 for water and diamond, respectively) but not as close to the experimental results as ABIS.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of communication, 28, 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and in the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from the gallup world poll. Journal of Economics Perspect, 22, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R., & Novemsky, N. (2008). Beyond rationality: The content of preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-Being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, M. Abramovitz, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. New York and London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2000). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Tang, J. (2007). Sun and water: On a modulus-based measurement of happiness. Emotion, 7, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Li, N., & Shen, L. (2009). Wealth, warmth, and well-being: Whether happiness is relative or absolute depends on whether it is about money, acquisition or consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2008). The construction of preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1209–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. NY: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (2008). Regarding inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Wharton School, the University of Pennsylvania.

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, C., & Soman, D. (2005). Attribute evaluability and range effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, D. A., Allen, D., & Parker, S. (2006). Hedonic contrast and condensation: Good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, D. A., Rohm, E. A., Bassetti, T. L., & Parker, S. (2003). Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 468–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adelle X. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, A.X., Hsee, C.K. & Zheng, X. The AB Identification Survey: Identifying Absolute versus Relative Determinants of Happiness. J Happiness Stud 13, 729–744 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9288-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9288-0

Keywords

Navigation