Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in corporate diversification

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the diversification and refocusing strategies of firms in the last three decades. The 1980s were characterized by a trend towards greater focus. This trend slackens in the 1990s to be replaced by a surge in the number of newly listed single-segment firms. From 2000 to 2007 there is very little change in the proportion of diversified firms. Overall, the proportion of conglomerates declines from 40% to 17% from 1980 to 1997. In addition, about one third of the diversifying firms reverse the diversification decision within four years. The analysis of the statements made by these firms suggests that there is significant heterogeneity in the motivations behind diversification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S., Denis, D.: Internal capital markets and investment policy: evidence from corporate spinoffs. J. Financ. Econ. 71, 489–516 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J., Lummer, S., McConnell, J., Reed, D.: Can takeover losses explain spin-off gains? J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 30, 465–485 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammann, M., Hoechle, D., Schmid, M.: Is there really no conglomerate discount? Working Paper, University of St. Gallen (2008)

  • Barnes, E., Hardie-Brown, G.: The diversification puzzle: revisiting the value impact of diversification for UK firms. J. Bus. Finance Account. 33, 1508–1534 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Hann, R.: The impact of SFAS NO. 131 on information and monitoring. J. Account. Res. 41, 163–223 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Ofek, E.: Diversification’s effect on firm value. J. Financ. Econ. 37, 39–65 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campa, J., Kedia, S.: Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57, 1731–1762 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comment, R., Jarrell, G.: Corporate focus and stock returns. J. Financ. Econ. 37, 67–87 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J., Zenner, M.: How do managerial incentives affect inter-firm tender offers? Financ. Markets Portf. Manag. 9, 312–321 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., French, K.: Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? J. Financ. Econ. 60, 3–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., French, K.: New lists: fundamentals and survival rates. J. Financ. Econ. 73, 229–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, Z., Lynch, A.: Why do firms merge and then divest? A theory of financial synergy. J. Bus. 72, 319–346 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Lemmon, M., Wolf, J.: Does corporate diversification destroy value? J. Finance 57, 695–720 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, D., Diltz, D.: Why firms diversify? An empirical examination. Financ. Manag. 21, 5–35 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., Levine, R.: Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? J. Financ. Econ. 85, 331–367 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L., Stulz, R.: Tobin’s q, corporate diversification and firm performance. J. Polit. Econ. 102, 1248–1280 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J.: Corporate diversification, value maximization, and organizational capabilities. J. Bus. 74, 409–431 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic, V., Phillips, G.: Do conglomerate firms allocate resources inefficiently across industries? Theory and evidence. J. Finance 57, 721–767 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., Santoni, G.: Are stockholders harmed by mergers and takeovers? Financ. Markets Portf. Manag. 2, 45–54 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., Servaes, H., Zingales, L.: The cost of diversity: the diversification discount and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55, 35–80 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovetta, B.: Investment policies and excess returns in corporate spin-offs: evidence from the US market. Financ. Markets Portf. Manag. 20, 287–307 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanzhar, S.: Discounted but not diversified: organizational structure and conglomerate discount. SSRN Working Paper at http://ssrn.com/abstract=387800 (2006)

  • Scharfstein, D.: The dark side of internal capital markets II: evidence from diversified conglomerates. NBER Working Paper 6352 (1998)

  • Scharfstein, D., Stein, J.: The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55, 2537–2564 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M., Walter, I.: Do financial conglomerates create or destroy economic value? J. Financ. Intermed. 18, 193–216 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoar, A.: Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. J. Finance 57, 2379–2403 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J.: Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. J. Finance 52, 111–133 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B.: Does diversification cause the ‘diversification discount’? Financ. Manag. 33, 5–27 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilanjan Basu.

Additional information

Address for correspondence: MB 12-317, 1450 Guy St., Montreal, QC H1H 1L8, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basu, N. Trends in corporate diversification. Financ Mark Portf Manag 24, 87–102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-009-0123-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-009-0123-0

JEL Classification

Navigation