Skip to main content
Log in

Incentives underlying tax policies in a decentralized federation with horizontal leadership and transboundary environmental damage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns income- and production taxation in a decentralized fiscal federalism model where the ability to commit differs among member countries. It is assumed that the federal government dictates environmental targets to be implemented at the national level, where the horizontal leader has commitment power vis-à-vis the other country (the follower). The results show how incentives underlying the horizontal leader’s tax policies are influenced by the decision structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, e.g. Mäler (1989); Carraro (2003); van der Ploeg and de Zeeuw (1992) and Aronsson and Blomq (2003).

  2. Channels from a higher (federal) level government to a lower level government (member state) are typically denoted vertical, while channels at the same level are denoted horizontal.

  3. It is rather straightforward to introduce other types of horizontal interactions such as e.g. labor mobility which would potentially give rise to strategic actions across member states.

  4. In most literature dealing with decentralized fiscal federlism there is an underlying assumption of Nash competition at country level.

  5. The price of good \(x\) is treated as exogenous at both the federal- and national level.

  6. The sector specific production factor—introduced to avoid fixed wages—will be suppressed for notational convenience throughout the paper. It is implicitly assumed that the sector specific factor is owned by the domestic government.

  7. To focus on the interactions via the environmental damage and targets, other potential issues such as labor mobility have been discarded. The mechanisms found in the present setup would however still remain.

  8. Note that, since the environmental damage is linear in the bad input, \(e^{i}\) equals the use of bad input, \(b^i\).

  9. The reason is that, although the leader may influence the production tax, \(t^{2}\), it only affects \(b^{2}\left( \cdot \right) \) which, in the end, must be determined by the environmental target level. Therefore, a constraint reflecting horizontal leadership via \(t^{2}\) would become redundant in this specific setup.

  10. In a noncooperative Nash equilibrium the production tax reduces to this term.

  11. According to the full first order conditions for the environmental targets (equilibrium conditions have been used in Eq. 7), there are, however, additional effects arising from a change in the hours of work. This makes the total effect on the use of the bad input ambiguous.

  12. The notation follows the previous cases where \(e^{i}=E^{i}\).

References

  • Aronsson, T., Blomquist, S.: Optimal taxation, global externalities, and labor mobility. J. Public Econ. 87, 2749–2764 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., Jonsson, T., Sjögren, T.: Environmental policy and optimal taxation in a decentralized economic federation. Finanz Arch. 62, 437–454 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T.: Optimal income taxation and decentralized fiscal federalism. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 40, 187–195 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., Persson, L.: Decentralized fiscal federalism revisited: optimal income taxation and public goods under horizontal leadership. Econ. Lett. 117, 223–226 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A., Silva, E.: Federal acid rain games. J. Urban Econ. 46, 25–52 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. (ed.): The endogenous formation of economic coalitions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, V.: Which commodity taxes should supplement the income tax? J. Public Econ. 24, 195–220 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köthenbürger, M.: Tax competition in a fiscal union with decentralized leadership. J. Urban Econ. 91, 481–496 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G.: The acid rain game. In: Folmer, H., van Ierland, E. (eds.) Valuation methods and policy making in environmental economics, pp. 231–252. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A.: Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Scan. J. Econ. 77, 86–98 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E., Caplan, A.: Transboundary pollution control in federal systems. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. Manag. 34, 173–186 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, F., de Zeeuw, A.J.: International aspects of pollution control. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2, 117–139 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Thomas Aronsson and Tomas Sjögren for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Persson.

Additional information

Research grants from FORMAS, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, and the Swedish Tax Agency are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Persson, L. Incentives underlying tax policies in a decentralized federation with horizontal leadership and transboundary environmental damage. Lett Spat Resour Sci 8, 77–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0123-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation