ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Global and Planetary Change
Volume 61, Issues 1-2, March 2008, Pages 79-88
Carbon Cycle and Hydrology in the Palaeo-terrestrial Environment
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (589 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.08.008    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Did geologic emissions of methane play any role in Quaternary climate change?

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Giuseppe Etiopea, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Alexei V. Milkovb and Edward Derbyshirec

aINGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome 2 Department, Italy

bBP America, Exploration and Production Technology Group, Houston, Texas, USA

cCentre for Quaternary Research, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK


Accepted 30 May 2007. 
Available online 4 September 2007.

Abstract

The “methane-led hypotheses” assume that gas hydrates and marine seeps are the sole geologic factors controlling Quaternary atmospheric and climate changes. Nevertheless, a wider class of geologic sources of methane exist which could have played a role in past climate changes. Beyond offshore seepage, relevant geologic emissions of methane (GEM) are from onshore seepage, including mud volcanism, microseepage and geothermal flux; altogether GEM are the second most important natural source of atmospheric methane at present. The amount of methane entering the atmosphere from onshore GEM seems to prevail on that from offshore seepage. Onshore sources inject a predominantly isotopically heavy (13C-enriched) methane into the atmosphere. They are controlled mainly by endogenic (geodynamic) processes, which induce large-scale gas flow variations over geologic and millennial time scales, and only partially by exogenic (surface) conditions, so that they are not affected by negative feedbacks. The eventual influence on atmospheric methane concentration does not necessarily require catastrophic or abrupt releases, as proposed for the “clathrate gun hypothesis”. Enhanced degassing from these sources could have contributed to the methane trends observed in the ice core records, and could explain the late Quaternary peaks of increased methane concentrations accompanied by the enrichment of isotopically heavy methane, as recently observed. This hypothesis shall be tested by means of robust multidisciplinary studies, mainly based on a series of atmospheric, biologic and geologic proxies.

Keywords: climate change; methane; greenhouse gas emissions; Quaternary

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Previously hypothesized potential causes of atmospheric methane variations during the late Quaternary
3. GEM hypothesis
3.1. Was the absolute contribution from GEM higher in the pre-anthropogenic times?
3.2. Potential proxies for Quaternary GEM
3.2.1. Atmospheric proxy: Isotopic compositions of methane in past atmospheres
3.2.2. Biologic proxies
3.2.3. Geologic proxies
3.3. Potential link between GEM and endogenic processes
3.4. Case study: Mud volcanism in the Caspian region
4. Summary and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References




Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0651860394; fax: +39 0651860338.

Global and Planetary Change
Volume 61, Issues 1-2, March 2008, Pages 79-88
Carbon Cycle and Hydrology in the Palaeo-terrestrial Environment
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.