Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Did geologic emissions of methane play any role in Quaternary climate change?
Accepted 30 May 2007.
Abstract
The “methane-led hypotheses” assume that gas hydrates and marine seeps are the sole geologic factors controlling Quaternary atmospheric and climate changes. Nevertheless, a wider class of geologic sources of methane exist which could have played a role in past climate changes. Beyond offshore seepage, relevant geologic emissions of methane (GEM) are from onshore seepage, including mud volcanism, microseepage and geothermal flux; altogether GEM are the second most important natural source of atmospheric methane at present. The amount of methane entering the atmosphere from onshore GEM seems to prevail on that from offshore seepage. Onshore sources inject a predominantly isotopically heavy (13C-enriched) methane into the atmosphere. They are controlled mainly by endogenic (geodynamic) processes, which induce large-scale gas flow variations over geologic and millennial time scales, and only partially by exogenic (surface) conditions, so that they are not affected by negative feedbacks. The eventual influence on atmospheric methane concentration does not necessarily require catastrophic or abrupt releases, as proposed for the “clathrate gun hypothesis”. Enhanced degassing from these sources could have contributed to the methane trends observed in the ice core records, and could explain the late Quaternary peaks of increased methane concentrations accompanied by the enrichment of isotopically heavy methane, as recently observed. This hypothesis shall be tested by means of robust multidisciplinary studies, mainly based on a series of atmospheric, biologic and geologic proxies.
Keywords: climate change; methane; greenhouse gas emissions; Quaternary
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Previously hypothesized potential causes of atmospheric methane variations during the late Quaternary
- 3. GEM hypothesis
- 3.1. Was the absolute contribution from GEM higher in the pre-anthropogenic times?
- 3.2. Potential proxies for Quaternary GEM
- 3.2.1. Atmospheric proxy: Isotopic compositions of methane in past atmospheres
- 3.2.2. Biologic proxies
- 3.2.3. Geologic proxies
- 3.3. Potential link between GEM and endogenic processes
- 3.4. Case study: Mud volcanism in the Caspian region
- 4. Summary and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (1)

2.76×1010 m3 and 





