Conservation “identity” and marine protected areas management: A Mediterranean case study
Introduction
The Mediterranean Sea supports many endangered, endemic species, and it is an important hotspot for targeted conservation (Danovaro et al., 2010, Mouillot et al., 2011). It is an enclosed sea with a slow flush and exchange rate, both of which exacerbate its pollution problems. Further, environmental awareness among the sea's surrounding populations is low, leading to much unregulated development and overexploitation along its coasts (Laubier, 2005). As such, the management of activities within the sea is crucial, highlighting the need for an enhanced set of MPAs with high levels of protection, arranged as a network (Portman et al. 2013). Therefore analyzing the context within which marine protected areas (MPAs) are established and designed is important for understanding the potential for marine conservation in this area of the world (Coll et al., 2011, Levin et al., 2013).
Our research aims to identify conditions under which countries are amenable to conservation actions. Similar past efforts have examined spatial location in relation to management regimes of terrestrial protected areas (e.g., Eigenbrod et al., 2010, Seiferling et al., 2012) and others have examined geographic location and spatial attributes of MPAs (e.g., Guarderas et al., 2008, Weeks et al., 2010a). Most have looked at geographic location and spatial characteristics (such as size) in relation to the effectiveness of management regimes in terms of ecological conditions (e.g., Coll et al., 2011, Sala et al., 2012). Such studies shed light on the physical context within which conservation actions occur. Few studies have looked at characteristics of management regimes in relation to the socio-economic context within which they are developed, even though it is clear that such studies are needed (McDonald and Boucher, 2011, Sala et al., 2012)
To improve understanding of countries’ decision making in regards to MPA management regimes, we reviewed information on MPAs of the Mediterranean Sea using several parameters such as their geographic distribution and physical characteristics together with parameters based on MPA management plans. Previous studies have surveyed MPAs using geographic distribution and physical characteristics (e.g., Coll et al., 2011, Guarderas et al., 2008, Sala et al., 2012) and some even consider socio-economic parameters (e.g., Abdulla et al. 2008, Weeks et al. 2010a). However, these past studies have not considered characteristics of management plans. For example, – Levin et al. (2013), examined the potential of countries to collaborate across national borders for improved marine conservation in the Mediterranean Sea. This study used size of MPAs as a proxy for marine conservation action without considering varied regulation within the MPAs.
Where and how to establish an MPA, i.e., according to what parameters, should be a question of local goals and objectives (Eigenbrod et al., 2010, Klein et al., 2008) but will also undoubtedly reflect country and regional contexts and priorities (Seiferling et al., 2012, Weeks et al., 2010b). Our research seeks to characterize MPAs in the Mediterranean by how countries interact with the marine environment. We hypothesize that those countries with greater protection levels within their MPAs will be those with a greater focus on the marine environment for conservation and those exhibiting greater dependence on the maritime economy. If similar to terrestrial PAs, marine PAs will likely be in areas relatively excluded from human activity (Seiferling et al. 2012). Although this study falls short of in-depth analysis of the specific management regimes within the protected areas, by using an ordinary least square (OLS) regression analysis we attempt to model levels of protection within MPAs. Levels of protection are modeled as a function of: (a) economic conditions, (b) distribution of human activities (human impacts) and (c) what we refer to as conservation “identity”.
Section snippets
Defining MPAs and their management regimes
According to the Barcelona Convention,1 MPAs in the Mediterranean Sea should safeguard natural ecosystems in danger of disappearing, including areas most vital to habitat and species survival. This
Methods
Data on 142 MPAs in the Mediterranean Sea (see Table S2) was collected from international websites, particularly: Medpan, MPA Global, and Protected Planet – and from academic and professional literature and websites on specific MPAs. The list excludes islands unless they contain significant submerged areas around them. MPAs not yet fully established (i.e., proposed) at the time the data was collected were excluded, along with wetlands, inlets, coastal lagoons and enclosed bays. Although these
Results
This study used data for 142 MPAs6 in 19 countries (see Fig. 1) although for the regression modeling some countries were excluded due to a lack of specific information on the MPAs within them. Our previous study (Portman et al. 2012) surveyed only 117 MPAs, compared to the 142 in this study due to updated information (i.e., from Gabrié et al. 2012), representing a 21% increase in the number of MPAs examined. Some general information
Discussion
In this section we analyze our results in greater detail and discuss their implications. Throughout this discussion, in referencing the results of the regressions, we use the term “associated” to emphasize the relationship between dependent and independent variables as correlation and not causation. In other words, empirical observation and statistical analysis of data have led to empirical insights based on association.
Models III and IV indicate that countries with management plans that on
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Giuseppe di Carlo of the World Wildlife Fund Mediterranean Programme Office, for helpful review and comments on the manuscript. This research has been funded by the DEMARN project – Designation and Management of Marine Reserve Networks (European Commission, 7th Framework Programme 2007–2013 SP3-People, Grant 268115).
References (38)
- et al.
Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: A conceptual framework
Biological Conservation
(1990) - et al.
Italian marine reserve effectiveness: Does enforcement matter?
Biological Conservation
(2008) - et al.
A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes
Biological Conservation
(2013) - et al.
Valuing the non-use benefits of marine conservation zones: An application to the UK Marine Bill
Ecological Economics
(2010) - et al.
Protected and threatened components of fish biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea
Current Biology
(2011) - et al.
He who hesitates is lost: Why conservation of the Mediterranean Sea is necessary and possible now
Marine Policy
(2013) - et al.
Status of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean Sea
(2008) Nature's ‘free gifts’ and the ecological significance of value
Capital & Class
(1999)- Central Intelligence Agency. (2012). CIA World Factbook. Retrieved December, 2012 from...
- et al.
Marine reserves: Size and age do matter
Ecology Letters
(2008)
Marine reserves: Fish life history and ecological traits matter
Ecological Applications
The Mediterranean Sea under siege: Spatial overlap between marine biodiversity, cumulative threats and marine reserves
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Deep-Sea biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable
PLoS ONE
Geopolitical factors of maritime 741 policies and 742 marine spatial planning: State, regions, and geographical planning scope
Marine Policy
Guidelines for applying protected area management categories
Representation of ecosystem services by tiered conservation strategies
Conservation Letters
Pluriannual analysis of the reserve effect on the Ichthyofauna in the Scandola natural reserve (Corsica Northwestern Mediterranean)
Oceanologica Acta
The status of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean Sea
MedPAN Collection
Cited by (6)
Imperiled Common Dolphins of the Mediterranean Sea
2022, Imperiled: The Encyclopedia of Conservation: Volume 1-3How good is your marine protected area at curbing threats?
2018, Biological ConservationCitation Excerpt :This led to debate about their appropriateness at effectively reducing threats (Agardy et al., 2011; Jameson et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Rodríguez et al., 2015). Most studies that aimed at evaluating MPAs effectiveness at reducing threat intensities were based on large scale assessments, with resolutions of 500 m (Batista et al., 2014) or 1 km2 grid cells (Micheli et al., 2013; Portman and Nathan, 2015). Little emphasis has been given on mapping MPAs' specific threats acting at smaller spatial scales – possibly with some heterogeneity across MPA zones in the case of multiple-use MPAs–, those at which MPAs and their respective management actions are primarily designed to operate in (MPAs being a local spatial management tool; Olsen et al., 2013).
Development and testing of a new framework for rapidly assessing legal and managerial protection afforded by marine protected areas: Mediterranean Sea case study
2016, Journal of Environmental ManagementCumulative pressures and low protection: A concerning blend for Mediterranean MPAs
2015, Marine Pollution BulletinCitation Excerpt :However, the higher mean pressure level in inshore MPA area than in the broader inshore marine environment has a more challenging explanation, given that MPA regulations and management are likely to exclude some endogenous coastal pressures from within their boundaries (e.g., fish farms or marinas). Portman and Nathan (2015) recently found that the majority of a sample of 136 national Mediterranean MPAs was also more impacted than the broader coastal environment. They speculate that this might be the result of designating highly impacted areas as MPAs or that human impact might have increased after designation, although both hypotheses seem counterintuitive, as impacts are expected to decrease after protection (Rodríguez-Rodríguez et al., in press) and areas with relatively low pressures (i.e., less human uses) are prone to easier designation (Micheli et al., 2013b; Coll et al., 2015).
Management effectiveness and conservation prioritizing the protected areas using RAPPAM methodology (case study: Khuzestan province)
2019, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment