ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Precambrian Research
Volume 160, Issues 1-2, 5 January 2008, Pages 159-178
Testing the Rodinia Hypothesis: Records in its Building Blocks
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1286 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.019    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Global record of 1600–700 Ma Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs): Implications for the reconstruction of the proposed Nuna (Columbia) and Rodinia supercontinents

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

R.E. Ernsta, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, M.T.D. Wingatec, d, f, K.L. Buchane and Z.X. Lif

aErnst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1T 3Y2, Canada

bDepartment of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1T 3Y2, Canada

cGeological Survey of Western Australia, 100 Plain Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia

dTectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

eGeological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada

fDepartment of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA 6845, Australia


Received 26 September 2006; 
revised 21 March 2007; 
accepted 23 April 2007. 
Available online 16 June 2007.

Abstract

Large igneous provinces (LIPs) are commonly associated with breakup of continents, and therefore, are a critical source of information to constrain paleocontinental reconstructions. We review the record of LIPs emplaced during the 1600–700 Ma interval. Regional-scale magmatic events at 1460, 1380, and 1280 Ma can be associated with the breakup of the proposed late-Paleoproterozoic supercontinent, Nuna (Columbia), events at 1300–900 Ma overlap with the assembly of Rodinia, and events at 825, 800, 780, 755, and possibly 720 Ma, are associated with the breakup of Rodinia. Furthermore, the extensional events at 1000 and 900 Ma are associated with breakups suggesting simultaneous assembly and breakup of different parts of the supercontinent. The possibility of spatially separated (independent) LIPs having the same age complicates the use of LIPs to constrain specific aspects of reconstructions. This study identifies such spatially separated but coeval LIPs at 1460, 1380, 1270, and 1115–1070 Ma (and possibly at 825, 780, and 755 Ma). Regionally grouped LIPs, possibly representing superplume events, are recognized at 825–755 Ma, and at 1280–1235 Ma. The use of the LIP record to assist the reconstruction of Rodinia will improve as numerous remaining poorly characterized magmatic units are dated using precise methods.

Keywords: Large igneous provinces; Rodinia; Nuna; Columbia; Mesoproterozoic; Neoproterozoic

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Large igneous provinces (LIPs)
3. Using LIPs to test reconstructions
4. LIP record: 1600–700 Ma
4.1. Comparison of LIP ‘bar code’ records between cratons
4.2. Pre-Rodinia LIP events (1600–1300 Ma)
4.2.1. 1600–1580 Ma (N Baltica, S Australia, NW Laurentia)
4.2.2. 1470–1430 Ga (E&W Laurentia, NW Australia, NW Baltica)
4.2.3. 1380 Ma (E&NE Laurentia, Siberia, Congo, Kalahari, Antarctica)
4.3. Assembly of Rodinia (1300–900 Ma)
4.3.1. 1280–1235 Ma (N&E Laurentia, NW Baltica)
4.3.2. 1220–1210 Ma (W Australia, N Baltica)
4.3.3. 1117–1070 Ma (C&SW Laurentia, S Africa, C&W Australia)
4.3.4. 1005–900 Ma (S America, E Siberia and Congo)
4.4. Breakup of Rodinia (900–700 Ma)
4.4.1. 825–800 Ma (S Australia, S China, Tarim, India, C&S Africa)
4.4.2. 780 Ma (W Laurentia, South China, Tarim, Australia)
4.4.3. 755 Ma (NW Australia, Greater India, Seychelles, S Siberia, South China, North China, S Africa)
4.4.4. 720 Ma (N Laurentia, Kalahari)
5. Discussion
5.1. LIP/plume clusters
5.2. LIPs emplaced during times of supercontinent assembly versus breakup
5.3. Expanding the LIP record
Acknowledgements
References




Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author at: Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1T 3Y2, Canada.

Precambrian Research
Volume 160, Issues 1-2, 5 January 2008, Pages 159-178
Testing the Rodinia Hypothesis: Records in its Building Blocks
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.