Skip to main content
Log in

Regulatory and Mixed Policy Options for Reducing Energy Use and Carbon Emissions

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses non-fiscal policy options to reduce energy demand and the resulting environmental impacts, and it reviews experiences with these options to date. Such policies include accelerating technology development and demonstration, stimulating product demand via procurement policies, applying efficiency standards to information-poor end-use sectors, and encouraging utility energy-efficiency programs. Efforts to implement such measures are underway in several industrialised countries and have begun in developing countries.

Increasing energy efficiency is an important area for near-term carbon emission reductions, and a key strategy for cost-effective mitigation of global climate change. However, little of the energy-efficiency potential identified by technical studies will be realised in the absence of policies to reduce barriers to energy-efficiency investments. Performance standards can overcome the lack of information on the part of energy users, while technology procurement helps overcome the view of manufacturers that introducing efficient products is risky.

The effects of these policy options on product markets are characterised, showing the synergy between different instruments and their potential to create and transform markets for energy-efficient products, systems and services. The existence of such energy-efficiency markets can stimulate new progress and innovation, providing the conditions in which the continuous process of technical improvement is significantly accelerated.

Most policy analysis and discussions regarding climate-change mitigation have centred on various forms of carbon emission taxes and to some extent on tradable emission offsets or permits. This article concludes with an examination of why non-fiscal options are mostly absent from energy-economic models and climate-change policy studies, and we suggest approaches to include them more fully in energy-policy analysis and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, W. B.: 1990, 'Positive Feedbacks in the Economy,' ScientificAmerican, pp.80-85, February.

  • Atkinson, B. A., McMahon, J. and Mills, E.: 1992,Analysis of Federal Policy Optionsfor Improving US Lighting Energy Efficiency: Commercial and Residential Buildings, LBL-31469, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

  • Ayres, R. U.: 1994, 'On Economic Disequilibrium and Free Lunch,' Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.4, pp.435-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L.: 1989, The Administrative Costs of Energy Conservation Programs, ORNIJCON-294, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  • Bohi, D. and Zimmerman, M.: 1984, 'An Update on Econometric Studies of Energy Demand Behavior, ' Annual Reviews of Energy, vol.9.

  • Billow-Huibe, H. and Ankarljung, T.: 1991, 'A Programme Targeted at More Permanent Conversion to Compact Fluorescent Lamps in the Residential Sector' Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Energy-Efficient Lighting, Stockholm.

  • Canadian Electrical Association (CEA): 1992, Demand-Side Management in Canada, CEA, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J., Wise, M. and MacCracken, C.: 1994, Advanced Energy Technologies and Climate Change,Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. and Rothkopf, M. H.: 1989, 'Market Failure and Energy Policy, 'Energy Policy, vol.17, pp.397-406, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins,. and Weyant,.: 1993, 'Tentative Conclusions Energy Modelling Forum Study Number 12 on Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions' in Kaya et al., eds., Costs, Impacts and Benefits of C02 Mitigation, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, H. S.: 1990, Efficient Electricity Use, A Development Strategyfor Brazil, {pmAmerican Council for Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington{.

  • Geller, H. and Nadel, S.: 1994, Market Transformation Strategies to Promote End-Use Efficiency, American Council for Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillissen, M.: 1995, 'Empirical Modelling of the Energy Conservation Investment Process of Firms,' Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency, ECEEE, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeltz, R. and Hirst, E.: 1986, ResidentialRetrofit Measures in the Hood River Conservation Project, ORNUCON-208, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  • Goldman, C. and Kahn, E.: 1993, 'Integrated Resource Planning: the Role of Competitive Forces,' Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study: The Energy Efficiency Challenge for Europe,Copenhagen.

  • Greene, D. L.: 1990, 'Cafe or Price?: An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978-89', The Energy Journal, vol.11, pp.37-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedenstrom, C.: 1991, Från Krog till Kontor: Slutrapport från Uppdrag 2000-lokaler,Vattenfall, Vallingby, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedenstrom, C., Goransson, A., Lindahl, U. and Forsman, G.: 1992, Lokalerna och Hushdllningen, STIL-studien, Vattenfall, Vallingby, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. and Reed, J.: 1991, Handbook of Evaluation of Utility DSM Programs, ORNL/CON-336, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  • Hogan, W. and Manne, A.: 1979, 'Energy-Economy Interactions,' Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources. vol. 1.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group 1: 1990, Scientific Assessment of Climate Change, UNEP, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (lEA): 1992, Energy Conservation in IEA Countries,OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Energy Conservation (IIEC): 1994, E-Notes,IIEC, Washington, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. and Busch, J.: 1994, 'Worldwide Status of Energy Standards for Buildings,' Energy: the International Journal, vol. 19, pp.27-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannuzzi, G. and Santos, V. dos: 1995, 'The Costs and Benefits of Residential Lighting Programs in Brazil,' Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Energy-Efficient Lighting, Newcastle.

  • Johansson, T. B. and Swisher, J.: 1993, 'Perspectives on Bottom-Up Analysis of Costs of Carbon Diox-ide Emission Reductions,' Proceedings of the OECD International Conference on the Economics of Climate Change,Paris.

  • Joskow, P. and Marron, D.: 1993, 'What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs,' The Energy Journal, vol.13, No.4.

  • Krause, E, Haites, E., Howarth, R. and Koomey, J.: 1993, Cutting Carbon Emissions: Burden or Benefit, International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths, El Cerrito, Calif.

  • Larsen, A., Nielsen, L., Jorgensen, K. and Jordal-Jørgensen, J.: 1993, Virkemidler og Elbesparelser, AKF, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Ecuyer, M., Sachs, H., Fernstrom, G., Goldstein, D., Klumpp, E. and Nadel, S.: 1992, 'Stalking the Golden Carrot: A Utility Consortium to Accelerate the Introduction of Super-Efficient CFC-Free Refrigerators,' Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Hirst, E., Koomey, J., McMahon, J. and Sanstad, A.: 1994, Energy Efficiency, Market Failures, and Government Policy LBL-35376 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

  • Lewald, A. and Bowie, R.: 1993, 'What Is Happening with the Swedish Technology Procurement Program,' Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study: The Energy Efficiency Challenge for Europe, Copenhagen.

  • Lovins, A. B. and Lovins, H. L.: 1991, 'Least-Cost Climatic Stabilization,' Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol.16.

  • Manne, A.: 1992, 'Global 2100: Alternative Scenarios for Reducing Carbon Emissions,' OECD Economics Dept. Working Paper 111.

  • McMahon, J., Berman, D., Chan, P., Koomey, J., Levine, M. and Stoft, S.: 1990, 'Impacts of US Appliance Efficiency Standards on Consumers, Manufacturers, Electric Utilities and the Environment,' Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A., Wright, J. and Rosenfeld, A.: 1983, Supplying Energy Through Greater Efficiency,University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., Blake, W., Dagher, S. and Schutte, J.: 1992, 'Development of Measured Savings for a Small Commercialllndustrial Lighting Program,' Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, S.: 1992, 'Utility Demand-Side Management Experience and Potential-A Critical Review,' Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol.17.

  • Nadel, S., Atkinson, B. and McMahon, J.: 1993, 'A Review of US and Canadian Lighting Programs,' Energy: the International Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp.145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. and Temes, M.: 1993, 'Flipping the Industrial Market: The Move to High Efficiency Motors,' Proceedings: 6th National Demand-Side Management Conference, EPRI TR-102021, Electric Power Research Institute.

  • Nielsen, L., Jorgensen, K. and Jordal-Jørgensen, J.: 1992, Elbesparelseri Boliger, AKF, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, H.: 1992, 'Market Transformation by Technology Procurement and Demonstration,' Pro-ceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutek, Kansliet för effektivare energianvändning: 1993, Eleffektiv Disk-Tvätt-Kyl-Frys, Stockholm, June.

  • Orans, R., Woo, C. K., Swisher, J., Wiersma, B. and Horji, B.: 1992, Targeting DSMfor Transmission and Distribution Benefits, EPRI TR-100487, Electric Power Research Institute.

  • Pedersen, P. B.: 1992, Engineering Analysis Concerning Energy Efficiency Standards for Refrigerators and Freezers in Denmark, dk-TEKNIK, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, A.K.N.: 1991, 'Barriers to Improvements in Energy Efficiency,' Energy Policy, vol. 19, pp.953-961, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M.: 1989, 'Energy and Transportation in the United States,' AnnualReview of Energy, vol.14.

  • Ruderman, H., Levine, M. and McMahon, J.: 1987, 'The Behavior of the Market for Energy Efficiency in Residential Appliances Including Heating and Cooling Equipment,' The Energy Journal, vol. 8, no.1, pp. 101-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L. and Johnson, FX.: 1993, Energy Use in Sweden: An International Perspective, LBL-33819, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

  • Sharpe, V., D'Angelo, P. and Ruhnke, W.: 1993, 'Working With Customers: The Espanola Experience,'Proceedings of the Second International Energy Efficiency and DSM Conference, Stockholm.

  • Siniscalco, D.: 1993, Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R.: 1991, 'Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments,' The Energy Journal, vol.12, no.3, pp.15-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swisher, J.: 1994, 'Dynamics of Appliance Energy Efficiency in Sweden,' Energy: the International Journal, vol. 19, no.11, pp. 1131-1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swisher, J., Christiansson, L. and Hedenstrdm, C.: 1994, 'Dynamics of Energy-Efficient Lighting,' Energy Policy, vol. 22, pp. 581-594, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swisher, J. and Hedenstrdm, C.: 1993, 'The Role of Energy Efficiency for Utility Planning in a Deregulated Market,' Proceedings of the Second International Energy Efficiency and DSM Conference, Stockholm.

  • Swisher, J. and Villavicencio, A.: 1995, 'The UNEP Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Study: Implications forJoint Implementation,' in C. Jepma (ed. ), The Feasibility ofJointimplementation, Kluwer Publ., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP: 1994, UNEP Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Studies. Phase Two Report. UNEP Collab-orating Centre on Energy and Environment, RisØ, Denmark.

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 1994, Green LightsAnnualReport, EPA 430-R-94-005.

  • US Office of Technology Assessment (US OTA): 1992, Fuelling Development: Energy Technologies for Developing Countries, OTA-E-516, US Govt. Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velthuijsen, J. W.: 1993, 'Incentives for Investments in Energy Efficiency: An Econometric Evaluation and Policy Implications,' Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 3, pp. 163-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, E., Eto, J., Shown, L., Sonnenblick, R. and Payne, C.: 1994, 'Evaluation of Commercial Lighting Programs,' Proceedingsofthe ACEEE SummerStudy on EnergyEfficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling, H.: 1991, Technology Procurementfor Innovation in Swedish Construction, Byggforskningsrådet, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and Swisher, J.: 1993, 'Exploring the Gap: Top-down Versus Bottom-up Analyses of the Cost of Mitigating Global Warming,' Energy Policy, vol. 21, pp. 249-263, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 1993, Energy Efficiency and Conservation in the Developing World, World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swisher, J.N. Regulatory and Mixed Policy Options for Reducing Energy Use and Carbon Emissions. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1, 23–49 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000027538.90774.a8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000027538.90774.a8

Navigation