Abstract
The size distribution and growth rate dynamics of U.S. companieshave been extensively studied by many authors. In this paper,using the COMPUSTAT database, we extend the analysis todisaggregated data, studying 15 sectors of the U.S.manufacturing industry. The sectoral investigation reveals thepresence of general statistical properties that can be consideredvalid across all the studied sectors. In particular, theprobability density of firms growth rates invariably displays acharacteristic tent shape and the relation between the size of afirm and the variance of its rates of growth is characterized, indifferent sectors, by very similar scaling relations. Thepresence of characteristics that are robust and sectoral invarianthints at the existence of generic statistical properties shapingthe dynamic of firms across the whole industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, L. A. N., S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. A. Salinger, H. E. Stanley, and R. Stanley (1997) ‘Scaling Behavior in Economics: The Problem of Quantifying Company Growth', Physica A, 244, 1–24.
Bottazzi, G. (2001) ‘Firm Diversification and the Law of Proportionate Effect', LEM Working Paper S. Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, 2001-1
Bottazzi, G., G. Dosi, M. Lippi, F. Pammolli, and M. Riccaboni (2001) ‘Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 1161–1187.
Bottazzi, G., E. Cefis, and G. Dosi (2002) ‘Corporate Growth and Industrial Structure. Some Evidence from the Italian Manufacturing Industry', Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 705–723.
Bottazzi, G., and A. Secchi (2003a) ‘A Stochastic Model of Firm Growth', Physica A, 324, 213–219.
Bottazzi G., and A. Secchi (2003b) ‘Why Are Distributions of Firm Growth Rates Tent-Shaped?', Economics Letters, 80, 415–420.
Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts, and L. Samuelson (1988) ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 671–698.
Evans, D. S. (1987) ‘The Relationship between Firm growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries', Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 567–581.
Gibrat, R. (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
Hall, B. H. (1987) ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector', Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 583–606.
Hart, P. E., and S. J. Prais (1956) ‘The Analysis of Business Concentration', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 119, 150–191.
Hymer, S., and P. Pashigian (1962) ‘Firm Size and Rate of Growth', Journal of Political Economy, 70, 556–569.
Ljung, L. (1987) System Identification. Theory for the User. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mansfield, E. (1962) ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation and the Growth of Firms', American Economic Review, 52, 1023–1051.
Simon, H. A., and C. P. Bonini (1958) ‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms', American Economic Review, 48, 607–617.
Stanley, M. H. R., S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, R. Mantegna, M. A. Salinger, and H. E. Stanley (1996) ‘Zipf Plots and the Size Distribution of Firms', Economics Letters, 49, 453–457.
Stanley, M. H. R., L. A. N. Amaral, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, H. Leschhorn, P. Maass, M. A. Salinger, and H. E. Stanley (1996) ‘Scaling Behavior in the Growth of Companies', Nature, 379, 804–806.
Subbotin, M. T. (1923) ‘On the Law of Frequency of Errors', Matematicheskii Sbornik, 31, 296–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A. Common Properties and Sectoral Specificities in the Dynamics of U.S. Manufacturing Companies. Review of Industrial Organization 23, 217–232 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000031366.28559.c1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000031366.28559.c1