Common genetic variants in FOXP2 are not associated with individual differences in language development
View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Mueller, Kathryn L
Murray, Jeffrey C
Michaelson, Jacob J
Christiansen, Morten H
Reilly, Sheena
Tomblin, J Bruce
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2016
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Much of our current knowledge regarding the association of FOXP2 with speech and language
development comes from singleton and small family studies where a small number
of rare variants have been identified. However, neither genome-wide nor gene-specific
studies have provided evidence that common polymorphisms in the gene contribute to individual
differences in language development in the general population. One explanation for
this inconsistency is that previous studies have been limited to relatively small samples of
individuals with low language abilities, using low density gene coverage. The current study
examined the ...
View more >Much of our current knowledge regarding the association of FOXP2 with speech and language development comes from singleton and small family studies where a small number of rare variants have been identified. However, neither genome-wide nor gene-specific studies have provided evidence that common polymorphisms in the gene contribute to individual differences in language development in the general population. One explanation for this inconsistency is that previous studies have been limited to relatively small samples of individuals with low language abilities, using low density gene coverage. The current study examined the association between common variants in FOXP2 and a quantitative measure of language ability in a population-based cohort of European decent (n = 812). No significant associations were found for a panel of 13 SNPs that covered the coding region of FOXP2 and extended into the promoter region. Power analyses indicated we should have been able to detect a QTL variance of 0.02 for an associated allele with MAF of 0.2 or greater with 80% power. This suggests that, if a common variant associated with language ability in this gene does exist, it is likely of small effect. Our findings lead us to conclude that while genetic variants in FOXP2 may be significant for rare forms of language impairment, they do not contribute appreciably to individual variation in the normal range as found in the general population.
View less >
View more >Much of our current knowledge regarding the association of FOXP2 with speech and language development comes from singleton and small family studies where a small number of rare variants have been identified. However, neither genome-wide nor gene-specific studies have provided evidence that common polymorphisms in the gene contribute to individual differences in language development in the general population. One explanation for this inconsistency is that previous studies have been limited to relatively small samples of individuals with low language abilities, using low density gene coverage. The current study examined the association between common variants in FOXP2 and a quantitative measure of language ability in a population-based cohort of European decent (n = 812). No significant associations were found for a panel of 13 SNPs that covered the coding region of FOXP2 and extended into the promoter region. Power analyses indicated we should have been able to detect a QTL variance of 0.02 for an associated allele with MAF of 0.2 or greater with 80% power. This suggests that, if a common variant associated with language ability in this gene does exist, it is likely of small effect. Our findings lead us to conclude that while genetic variants in FOXP2 may be significant for rare forms of language impairment, they do not contribute appreciably to individual variation in the normal range as found in the general population.
View less >
Journal Title
PLoS One
Volume
11
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2016 Mueller et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Subject
Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified