Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/160501
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Three-dimensional spatial modeling of spines along dendritic networks in human cortical pyramidal neurons.

AutorAnton-Sanchez, Laura; Larrañaga, Pedro; Benavides-Piccione, Ruth CSIC ORCID ; Fernaud-Espinosa, Isabel CSIC ORCID; DeFelipe, Javier CSIC ORCID ; Bielza, Concha
Fecha de publicación2017
EditorPublic Library of Science
CitaciónPLoS ONE 12: 6 (2017)
ResumenWe modeled spine distribution along the dendritic networks of pyramidal neurons in both basal and apical dendrites. To do this, we applied network spatial analysis because spines can only lie on the dendritic shaft. We expanded the existing 2D computational techniques for spatial analysis along networks to perform a 3D network spatial analysis. We analyzed five detailed reconstructions of adult human pyramidal neurons of the temporal cortex with a total of more than 32,000 spines. We confirmed that there is a spatial variation in spine density that is dependent on the distance to the cell body in all dendrites. Considering the dendritic arborizations of each pyramidal cell as a group of instances of the same observation (the neuron), we used replicated point patterns together with network spatial analysis for the first time to search for significant differences in the spine distribution of basal dendrites between different cells and between all the basal and apical dendrites. To do this, we used a recent variant of Ripley's K function defined to work along networks. The results showed that there were no significant differences in spine distribution along basal arbors of the same neuron and along basal arbors of different pyramidal neurons. This suggests that dendritic spine distribution in basal dendritic arbors adheres to common rules. However, we did find significant differences in spine distribution along basal versus apical networks. Therefore, not only do apical and basal dendritic arborizations have distinct morphologies but they also obey different rules of spine distribution. Specifically, the results suggested that spines are more clustered along apical than in basal dendrites. Collectively, the results further highlighted that synaptic input information processing is different between these two dendritic domains.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/160501
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0180400
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180400
issn: 1932-6203
Aparece en las colecciones: (IC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Plos One 2017.pdf4,57 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

4
checked on 10-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on 15-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

267
checked on 22-abr-2024

Download(s)

193
checked on 22-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.