Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/181069
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Comparing seed dispersal effectiveness by frugivores at the community level

AutorGonzález-Castro, Aarón CSIC ORCID ; Calviño-Cancela, María; Nogales, Manuel CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveFunctional Redundancy
Germination
Seedling recruitment
Saurochory
Island Ecology
Seed Rain
Ornithochory
Fecha de publicaciónmar-2015
EditorEcological Society of America
CitaciónEcology 96(3): 808-818 (2015)
ResumenSeed dispersal effectiveness (SDE) is the contribution of dispersers to plant recruitment and is estimated as the product of the number of seeds dispersed (quantity) and the probability of recruitment of each dispersed seed (quality). Although SDE is a key concept in seed dispersal ecology, few studies estimate SDE and none has a community approach. Oceanic islands, with simple communities, are ideal for this purpose. In this study, we compared the SDE of the main types of dispersers (lizards and passerine birds) at the community level in a given habitat. We estimated SDE using a stochastic simulation model parameterized with empirical data on quantity and quality components measured throughout the recruitment process. Although lizards are highly frugivorous and their density was ~20 times higher than that of birds, lizards and birds dispersed a similar quantity of seeds. This may be due to lower intake of seeds by lizards due to their slower metabolism (~20 times lower than birds). This low metabolic rate limits the importance of lizards as seed dispersers, but it is compensated by extraordinarily high lizard densities in the study area (~9600 individuals/km2). High densities of lizards are typical of islands, and this helps to explain why dispersal by lizards seems mainly an island phenomenon. Birds and lizards showed functional complementarity, especially regarding seed dispersal distribution patterns. In fact, lizards dispersed more seeds in shrublands and open sites, and birds in woodlands and beneath canopies, with their joint contribution helping to maximize recruitment. Lizards provided higher SDE than birds for 7 out of 11 plant species. The disperser with a higher quantity for a given plant generally had the higher quality, and plants could be classified as bird- or lizard-dependent for dispersal. This dependence increased when considering SDE instead of dispersal quantity only. Moreover, quality was a better predictor of SDE than quantity, which should be considered when parameterizing interaction networks, as this might affect inferences about their architecture.
DescripciónCopyright by the Ecological Society of America
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1890/14-0655.1.sm
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/181069
DOI10.1890/14-0655.1.sm
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1890/14-0655.1.sm
issn: 0012-9658
e-issn: 1939-9170
Aparece en las colecciones: (IPNA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Comparing_González_2015.pdf1,84 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

333
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

430
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.