Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/245545
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Soil erosion modelling: A bibliometric analysis

AutorBezak, Nejc; Lizaga Villuendas, Iván CSIC ORCID ; Quijano Gaudes, Laura CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveSoil erosion modelling
Research impact
Participatory network
Systematic literature review
Citation analysis
Fecha de publicaciónjun-2021
EditorElsevier
CitaciónBezak N... [et al.] Soil erosion modelling: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Research 197: 111087 (2021)
ResumenSoil erosion can present a major threat to agriculture due to loss of soil, nutrients, and organic carbon. Therefore, soil erosion modelling is one of the steps used to plan suitable soil protection measures and detect erosion hotspots. A bibliometric analysis of this topic can reveal research patterns and soil erosion modelling characteristics that can help identify steps needed to enhance the research conducted in this field. Therefore, a detailed bibliometric analysis, including investigation of collaboration networks and citation patterns, should be conducted. The updated version of the Global Applications of Soil Erosion Modelling Tracker (GASEMT) database contains information about citation characteristics and publication type. Here, we investigated the impact of the number of authors, the publication type and the selected journal on the number of citations. Generalized boosted regression tree (BRT) modelling was used to evaluate the most relevant variables related to soil erosion modelling. Additionally, bibliometric networks were analysed and visualized. This study revealed that the selection of the soil erosion model has the largest impact on the number of publication citations, followed by the modelling scale and the publication's CiteScore. Some of the other GASEMT database attributes such as model calibration and validation have negligible influence on the number of citations according to the BRT model. Although it is true that studies that conduct calibration, on average, received around 30% more citations, than studies where calibration was not performed. Moreover, the bibliographic coupling and citation networks show a clear continental pattern, although the co-authorship network does not show the same characteristics. Therefore, soil erosion modellers should conduct even more comprehensive review of past studies and focus not just on the research conducted in the same country or continent. Moreover, when evaluating soil erosion models, an additional focus should be given to field measurements, model calibration, performance assessment and uncertainty of modelling results. The results of this study indicate that these GASEMT database attributes had smaller impact on the number of citations, according to the BRT model, than anticipated, which could suggest that these attributes should be given additional attention by the soil erosion modelling community. This study provides a kind of bibliographic benchmark for soil erosion modelling research papers as modellers can estimate the influence of their paper.
Descripción16 Pags.- 12 Figs.- 8 Tabls.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111087
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/245545
DOI10.1016/j.envres.2021.111087
ISSN0013-9351
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

80
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

65
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

67
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

9
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.