Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/61322
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Factors affecting red deer skin test responsiveness to bovine and avian tuberculin and to phytohaemagglutinin

AutorFernández de Mera, Isabel G. CSIC ORCID; Vicente, Joaquín CSIC ORCID ; Höfle, Ursula CSIC ORCID; Ruiz-Fons, Francisco CSIC ORCID ; Ortiz, José-Antonio; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID
Fecha de publicación2009
EditorElsevier
CitaciónPreventive Veterinary Medicine 90: 119- 126 (2009)
ResumenWe studied the effect of management on the responsiveness of red deer (Cervus elaphus) to skin testing with mycobacterial and non-mycobacterial antigens. We hypothesized that individuals from populations of the same species under different management conditions would have a different immune responsiveness. Deer sampled in this study included 1041 adult animals from 6 Spanish farms and 111 adult wild deer. We injected four sites of the neck with 0.1 ml bovine purified protein derivative (PPD), 0.1 ml avian PPD, 0.1 ml negative control PBS and 0.1 ml of Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA, containing 250 μg) as positive control, and measured the skin fold increase at time 72 h. Bovine PPD reactors were identified in 5 of 6 farms and among wild deer. Apparent prevalence among wild deer (18.9%) was not significantly higher than among farmed deer (14.5%). Avian PPD reactors were found among all 7 study populations, but apparent prevalence was lower among wild deer (<1%) than among farmed deer (12.6%; p < 0.001). Deer management (farmed versus wild) was identified as a key factor affecting deer skin fold thickness increase in response both to mycobacterial (bPPD and aPPD) and non-mycobacterial antigens (PHA). The differences occurred in the same sense, regardless of some interactions; farmed deer showing higher values. The PHA skin fold increase was not affected by the PPD skin test results. We propose that using PHA as a positive control may help in the interpretation of between-population differences in tuberculin responses. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/61322
DOI10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.04.005
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.04.005
issn: 0167-5877
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

312
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

109
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.