Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/75609
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Advanced modelling of runoff and soil redistribution for agricultural systems: the SERT model

AutorLópez-Vicente, Manuel CSIC ORCID ; Navas Izquierdo, Ana CSIC ORCID ; Gaspar Ferrer, Leticia CSIC ORCID ; Machín Gayarre, Javier CSIC
Palabras claveDR2 model
Cumulative runoff
SERT model
Soil redistribution
Agricultural systems
137Cs
Fecha de publicaciónjul-2013
EditorElsevier
CitaciónLópez-Vicente M, Navas A, Gaspar L, Machín J. Advanced modelling of runoff and soil redistribution for agricultural systems: the SERT model. Agricultural Water Management 125: 1-12 (2013)
ResumenHydrological and soil erosion models allow mapping and quantifying rates of runoff depths and soil redistribution for different land uses and climatic scenarios. Mediterranean soils are threatened by marked seasonal changes in the climatic, thus soil and vegetation parameters and modelling predictions at monthly scale are required. The semi-physically-based Soil Erosion and Redistribution Tool (SERT) model is presented together with the results of its application in a Mediterranean agro-ecosystem (NE Spain) with a detailed database. The hydrological module is based on the recently published DR2 (Distributed Rainfall-Runoff) water balance model and the effects of man-made infrastructures on the natural dynamics of runoff connectivity are added. The erosion module is built using, as the basis, the Revised Morgan, Morgan and Finney model, and the new Remaining runoff Transport Capacity (TCr) factor used to estimate the rates of soil loss and deposition. Predicted runoff depth varied in time and space, presenting areas without runoff production mainly in Rendzic Leptosols and Haplic Calcisols between November and April. Average soil erosion was high in cultivated and bare soils, ca. 20 and 10 Mg ha–1 yr–1, whereas rangeland soils were affected by moderate and, in some areas, by limited erosion processes. Soil erosion was minimal in February (0.08 Mg ha–1 month–1 on average) and 23 times higher in October. The SERT model allowed mapping the significant changes in the monthly values of soil redistribution quantifying the variability in the magnitude of the processes involved. Predicted values of average soil loss and deposition were validated against quantified values with 137Cs obtaining an average Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.48 (Pearson’s r = 0.709) and a sediment balance of -1.15 Mg yr–1 for the whole catchment that is consistent with the karst processes of the study area. The new model is an easy-to-run, reliable, low-input-demanding management tool with valuable outputs for hydrological and soil erosion studies in small agricultural catchments.
Descripción29 Pags., 3 Tabls., 6 Figs. The definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03783774
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.04.002
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/75609
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2013.04.002
ISSN0378-3774
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on 15-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

578
checked on 18-mar-2024

Download(s)

358
checked on 18-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.