Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PPG_23683 | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: A reabilitação com implantes nas últimas décadas tem evoluído tendo em vista a obtenção de melhores resultados ao nível mecânico/funcional, mas também a nível estético. A relação coronal dos implantes com crista óssea é um dos pontos que tem sido estudado.
Objectivo: Realizar uma revisão sobre a relação coronal dos implantes com a crista óssea, com objectivo de responder à seguinte questão “A posição sub-crestal dos implantes em relação à crista óssea é vantajosa?”. Para tal vão ser estudados alguns dos factores que podem influenciar esta decisão.
Metodologia: Realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica recorrendo às bases de dados da “MEDLINE/Pubmed”, “SciELO”, “Science Direct”, “B-on”, “Google Academic” e repositórios de várias universidades portuguesas e estrangeiras, com as palavras-chave: “Bone Cells” ”Bone remodeling”, “Bone Crest”, “Osseointegration”, “Implant Placement”, “Biologic Width” e “Platform Switching”,”Implant Placement Depth” e “Morse Cone”, tendo sido estas associadas entre si. Também foi realizada pesquisa manual em livros dos vários temas estudados.
Conclusão: A colocação de implantes ao nível sub-crestal ainda apresenta alguma controvérsia, mas obedecendo a alguns factores, como a utilização de um implante e pilar específicos, pode tornar- se algo muito vantajoso numa perspectiva futura.
Introduction: The rehabilitation using implants has evolved in the last decades with the purpose of obtaining better results at a mechanical/functional level but also at the aesthetic. The coronal relation between the implants and the bone crest is one of the points that have been more studied. Aim: Perform a revision about the coronal relation of the implants and the bone crest, with the goal to answer the following question “Is the sub-crest position of implants with the bone crest an advantage?”. For this, some factors that might influence this decision will be studied. Methodology: The bibliographic research was made using the data bases of “MEDLINE/Pubmed”, “SciELO”, “Science Direct”, “B-on”, “Google Academic” and the repositories of several Portuguese and foreign universities, using the following key-words:“Bone Cells” ”Bone remodeling”, “Bone Crest”, “Osseointegration”, “Implant Placement”, “Biologic Width” e “Platform Switching” e “Morse Cone”, and associating with each other. There were also used several books about the different subjects studied in this research. Conclusion: The implant placement at a sub-crestal level still presents some controversy, but following some factors, as using specific implant and abutment, it may become something very advantageous in a future perspective.
Introduction: The rehabilitation using implants has evolved in the last decades with the purpose of obtaining better results at a mechanical/functional level but also at the aesthetic. The coronal relation between the implants and the bone crest is one of the points that have been more studied. Aim: Perform a revision about the coronal relation of the implants and the bone crest, with the goal to answer the following question “Is the sub-crest position of implants with the bone crest an advantage?”. For this, some factors that might influence this decision will be studied. Methodology: The bibliographic research was made using the data bases of “MEDLINE/Pubmed”, “SciELO”, “Science Direct”, “B-on”, “Google Academic” and the repositories of several Portuguese and foreign universities, using the following key-words:“Bone Cells” ”Bone remodeling”, “Bone Crest”, “Osseointegration”, “Implant Placement”, “Biologic Width” e “Platform Switching” e “Morse Cone”, and associating with each other. There were also used several books about the different subjects studied in this research. Conclusion: The implant placement at a sub-crestal level still presents some controversy, but following some factors, as using specific implant and abutment, it may become something very advantageous in a future perspective.
Description
Keywords
Bone cells Bone remodeling Bone crest Osseointegration Implant placement Biologic width Platform switching Implant placement depth Morse Cone