B a c k g ro u n d. Neck metastases are the single most important prognostic factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Wise approach to neck treatment is then mandatory to give a chanche for cure. Still, there are some issues about neck dissection that need to be clarified. M e t h o d s. Through a review of the literature and of everyday clinical observations, the following issues are discussed: Functional Neck Dissection, biopsies, nodal levels, Selective Neck Dissections, Spinal Accessory Nerve, neck dissection classification. R e s u l t s. Integration of historical, anatomical, clinical and surgical concepts and up-to-date knowledge can allow to understand how to behave in diverse clinical situations. Conclusions. Standardized guidelines are far to be achieved. Wise behaviour, however, may allow to avoid some mistakes. The aim of this paper is to make the above mentioned issues clear and hopefully give more diffusion to concepts that too often seem to be overlooked.

D'Arpa S., Cherubino M., Giambona C., Centorbi S., Capizzi D., Pirrello R. (2007). NECK DISSECTIONS: MISCONCEPTIONS, MALPRACTICE AND COMMON CONTROVERSIES. ACTA CHIRURGICA MEDITERRANEA, 23, 189-194.

NECK DISSECTIONS: MISCONCEPTIONS, MALPRACTICE AND COMMON CONTROVERSIES

D'ARPA, Salvatore;PIRRELLO, Roberto
2007-01-01

Abstract

B a c k g ro u n d. Neck metastases are the single most important prognostic factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Wise approach to neck treatment is then mandatory to give a chanche for cure. Still, there are some issues about neck dissection that need to be clarified. M e t h o d s. Through a review of the literature and of everyday clinical observations, the following issues are discussed: Functional Neck Dissection, biopsies, nodal levels, Selective Neck Dissections, Spinal Accessory Nerve, neck dissection classification. R e s u l t s. Integration of historical, anatomical, clinical and surgical concepts and up-to-date knowledge can allow to understand how to behave in diverse clinical situations. Conclusions. Standardized guidelines are far to be achieved. Wise behaviour, however, may allow to avoid some mistakes. The aim of this paper is to make the above mentioned issues clear and hopefully give more diffusion to concepts that too often seem to be overlooked.
2007
D'Arpa S., Cherubino M., Giambona C., Centorbi S., Capizzi D., Pirrello R. (2007). NECK DISSECTIONS: MISCONCEPTIONS, MALPRACTICE AND COMMON CONTROVERSIES. ACTA CHIRURGICA MEDITERRANEA, 23, 189-194.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
347.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 63.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
63.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/75282
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact