Peer review in online and blended learning environments

McKenzie, JA; Parker, NJ

Peer review in online and blended learning environments

McKenzie, JA

Parker, NJ

Permalink

Publisher:: Australian Learning and Teaching Council
Publication Type:: Report
Citation:: 2011, pp. 1 - 75
Issue Date:: 2011-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (1.05 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	McKenzie, JA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-4366	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Parker, NJ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-4009	en_US
dc.date.issued	2011-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2011, pp. 1 - 75	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-921856-69-3	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19461
dc.description.abstract	This is the report of a project which used an action research approach to develop and test a scholarly framework for peer review in online and blended learning environments in higher education. The report includes a literature review, methodology, framework description, description of trialing and analysis of themes from interviews with trial participants. It draws conclusions about possible approaches to using peer review for promotion.	en_US
dc.publisher	Australian Learning and Teaching Council	en_US
dc.title	Peer review in online and blended learning environments	en_US
dc.type	Report
utslib.for	1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Teaching and Learning)
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.confidential	false	en_US

Abstract:

This is the report of a project which used an action research approach to develop and test a scholarly framework for peer review in online and blended learning environments in higher education. The report includes a literature review, methodology, framework description, description of trialing and analysis of themes from interviews with trial participants. It draws conclusions about possible approaches to using peer review for promotion.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19461