Investigation to combustion and emission characteristics of the dual ethanol injection spark ignition engine

Publication Type:
Conference Proceeding
Citation:
Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, AFMC 2016, 2016
Issue Date:
2016-01-01
Full metadata record
© 2006 Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society. All rights reserved. Ethanol fuel, as a bioproduct with greater octane number, combustion speed and latent heat of vaporization, has become a common choice as an additive and/or an alternative option to gasoline fuel in the spark ignition engines. In order to fully utilize ethanol fuel properties to improve engine performance, a new injection strategy, ethanol port injection plus ethanol direct injection (EDI), has been in development. Work reported in this paper aimed to investigate, experimentally, the effect of ethanol fuel and dual ethanol injection strategy on engine performance, combustion and emissions characteristics at two engine loads and optimized spark timing. The results of both engine loads, light and medium, demonstrated that the indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) was significantly improved over all dual ethanol injection strategy compared to GPI. The maximum improvement was 3.3485% and 4.357% at light and medium engine loads respectively. The improvement was mainly due to the reduced combustion duration (θ10-90%) which was reduced by 8.15CAD at light load and 4.28CAD at medium load compared to GPI. However, at higher EDI percentages, the over cooling effect and poor mixture quality adversely affected the combustion quality. The indicated specific nitric oxide emission was considerably reduced, at 100% of EDI, by up to 55.1% and 58.46% at light and medium loads respectively. Nevertheless, because of poor mixture quality and high wall wetting, the indicated specific hydrocarbon and the indicated specific carbon monoxide were raised with the increase of EDI percentage. Regarding the effect of spark timing, the dual ethanol injection strategy improved the IMEP significantly at the maximum IMEP spark timing.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: