The epistemology of value in the assessment of just terms compensation

Mangioni, V

The epistemology of value in the assessment of just terms compensation

Mangioni, V

Permalink

Publisher:: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Land reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 2008, 2008/1 pp. 47 - 55
Issue Date:: 2008-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (484.9 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Mangioni, V https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-2171	en_US
dc.date.issued	2008-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Land reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 2008, 2008/1 pp. 47 - 55	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0251-1894	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/9828
dc.description.abstract	Compulsory acquisition of land in Australia is predicated on the principles ofjust terms Icompensation. Based on these principles, the determination of compensation is subject to various statutes and court rulings. This article examines these principles and moves on to discuss the gaps in parity of compensation and how these gaps affect parties in the compulsory acquisition process. The article also looks at the influence compensation quantum and principles have over the value of properties, discussing how that value is determined and how valuation methods are used. It reviews a survey of dispossessed property owners in New South Wales, Australia, that was conducted to measure the success of the legislation and processes. Finally, the article concludes with an analysis of court directives; it asks whether these contribute to the impasse of points of difference in the assessment of value (and hinder the courts) when in fact they were designed to help Australian courts in expediting compulsory acquisition matters.	en_US
dc.publisher	Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Land reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Development Studies	en_US
dc.title	The epistemology of value in the assessment of just terms compensation	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2008/1	en_US
utslib.for	1205 Urban and Regional Planning	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.volume	2008/1	en_US

Abstract:

Compulsory acquisition of land in Australia is predicated on the principles ofjust terms Icompensation. Based on these principles, the determination of compensation is subject to various statutes and court rulings. This article examines these principles and moves on to discuss the gaps in parity of compensation and how these gaps affect parties in the compulsory acquisition process. The article also looks at the influence compensation quantum and principles have over the value of properties, discussing how that value is determined and how valuation methods are used. It reviews a survey of dispossessed property owners in New South Wales, Australia, that was conducted to measure the success of the legislation and processes. Finally, the article concludes with an analysis of court directives; it asks whether these contribute to the impasse of points of difference in the assessment of value (and hinder the courts) when in fact they were designed to help Australian courts in expediting compulsory acquisition matters.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/9828