Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap

journal contribution
posted on 2004-06-22, 00:00 authored by C Adams, R Evans
This article deals with two concerns in achieving greater accountability in social reports: the lack of completeness of reporting, and the lack of credibility of reports. The article focuses, in particular, on the role of social audits in improving the completeness and credibility of reporting, thereby reducing the audit expectations gap. We suggest that this gap arises due to an over-emphasis on the validity of performance data at the expense of addressing completeness and credibility, both of which, we argue, require stakeholder involvement. The article reviews recent guidelines aimed at ensuring that companies produce reports that are complete in all material respects including those produced by the Global Reporting Initiative and the Federation des Experts Comptables Europeens, focusing particularly on AccountAbility's AA1000 Standard and AA1000S Assurance Standard. Finally, the article considers the development of a practical approach to social audit following principles increasingly being incorporated into developing assurance guidelines aimed at reducing the audit expectations gap.

History

Journal

Journal of corporate citizenship

Issue

14

Season

Summer

Pagination

97 - 115

Publisher

Greenleaf Publishing

Location

Sheffield, England

ISSN

1470-5001

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2004, Greenleaf Publishing

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC