Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/204378
Title: A Comparative Study on the Concept of Lok Adalat with Reference to Settelment of Disputes Under Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Researcher: Bhattad Rajkumari D.
Guide(s): More V. M.
Keywords: lok adalat
University: Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University
Completed Date: 29/04/2017
Abstract: Amicable resolution of disputes is a sine quo non for the social peace and newlineharmony. Peace is the sine qua non for development. Disputes and conflicts dissipate newlinevaluable time, effort and money of the society. Any conflict which raises its head newlineshould be nipped in the bud. The quest for the justice is visible in all civilization. An newlineaggrieved party should be given speedy, less expensive and reliable justice. Justice newlinehas been the passionate demand of the human kind. Whichever form of government a newlinesociety opts for the noble idea of justice, liberty and equality should incense its entire newlineconstitutional edifice. Speedy, less expensive and reliable justice is the root of the real newlinesocio-economical justice. newlineIndia has inherited its prevalent judicial system from the British. It has its newlineadvantages with its disadvantages too. Administration of justice involves not only newlineprotection of the innocent, punishment of the guilty, satisfactory resolution of disputes newlinebut most importantly delivery of justice on time is crucial for litigants. Thus, it is newlineobserved today that the prevailing system of administration of justice is not suitable to newlinethe socio-economic conditions of India. In fact, amicable resolution of disputes is a newlinesine quo non for the social peace and harmony. Access to inexpensive and expeditious newlinejustice is a basic human right.1 As it is rightly held by Hon ble Apex Court in its newlinelandmark judgment2 that any procedure which do not provide for speedy disposal of newlinethe matter in controversy abridges the fundamental right of personal liberty. newlineAs it is rightly held by Hon ble Apex Court in its landmark judgment3 that any newlineprocedure which do not provide for speedy disposal of the matter in controversy newlineabridges the fundamental right of personal liberty and therefore, it is held by the newlineHon ble Apex Court that the speedy trials is the fundamental right of every person. It newlineis pertinent to note here that as Justice delayed is justice denied . newline1Lawyers as Professionals By Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General of India, AIR 2002. newline2Hussaina
Pagination: 280p
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/204378
Appears in Departments:Faculty of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_decalaration.pdf127.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_abstract.pdf493.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_acknowledgement.pdf128.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_abbriviations.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_contents.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter 1.pdf231.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter 2.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 3.pdf498.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 4.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 5.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 6.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 7.pdf190.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 8.pdf8.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_conclusion.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_bibliography.pdf15.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: