Aim: This research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide. Results: The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex. Conclusion: Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.

Passarelli, P. C., Ferro, M., De Angelis, P., Papi, P., Piccirillo, G. B., Desantis, V., Papa, R., Pompa, G., D'Addona, A., Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study, <<JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION>>, 2020; 12 (3): 229-235. [doi:10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/170384]

Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study

Passarelli, Pier Carmine;De Angelis, Paolo;D'Addona, Antonio
2020

Abstract

Aim: This research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide. Results: The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex. Conclusion: Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.
2020
Inglese
Passarelli, P. C., Ferro, M., De Angelis, P., Papi, P., Piccirillo, G. B., Desantis, V., Papa, R., Pompa, G., D'Addona, A., Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study, <<JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION>>, 2020; 12 (3): 229-235. [doi:10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/170384]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/170384
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact