Structural Restrictions to Gerrymandering: An Examination of the Effect of the Number of Districts on Partisan Redistricting
Abstract
Gerrymandering, which is the practice of drawing representative districts to enable an unfair electoral advantage for one particular group, has afflicted the American political system for centuries. However, certain states that have been apportioned only one congressional district, cannot engage in gerrymandering because there are no lines to draw. Thus the structural requirement prevents gerrymandering from occurring at the congressional level in these states. Based on this observation, it might seem that reducing the number of districts might simultaneously decrease the potency of gerrymandering. This paper examines the relationship between the number of districts and gerrymandering along with the effect that the change in districts over time has on partisan redistricting. The results produce here suggests that more populous states with many districts are more susceptible to gerrymandering than their less populous counterparts. However, there does not appear to be any significant relationship between the change in the number of districts over time and the level of gerrymandering.
Description
M.P.P.
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1050874Date Published
2018Subject
Type
Publisher
Georgetown University
Extent
68 leaves
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Engagement: Do Ballot Initiatives Affect Whether Voters Care About the Partisan Outcome of Congressional Elections?
Richardson, Karoline (Georgetown University, 2012)While ballot initiatives have existed in the United States since the Progressive Era, their popularity has risen in the past few decades as more initiatives qualify to be placed on the ballot. Numerous studies have examined ...