United States v. Abu-Jihaad
Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law
“Evidence obtained pursuant to FISA warrants was properly admitted into evidence against defendant because FISA was not rendered unconstitutional by a PATRIOT Act amendment that allows surveillance warrants to issue upon certification by the executive of a ‘significant’ rather than ‘primary’ purpose to obtain foreign intelligence information.” 650 F.3d at 143. “Inculpatory evidence obtained pursuant to FISA warrants was properly admitted into evidence against defendant because all FISA requirements were complied with in this case, and due process did not demand disclosure of FISA applications to defendant or an adversarial hearing.” Id.
View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1952892383478751676&q=630+F.3d+102&hl=en&as_sdt=20006
Files in this item
Creator
Raggi, Reena, 1951-
Bibliographic Citation
United States v. Abu-Jihaad, 630 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2010)
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1057412Date
2010-12-20Type
Publisher
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit