Informed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership
Creator
Archard, David
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008; 25(1): 19-34
Abstract
Using the example of an unconsented mouth swab I criticise the view that an action of this kind taken in itself is wrongful in respect of its being a violation of autonomy. This is so much inasmuch as autonomy merits respect only with regard to 'critical life choices'. I consider the view that such an action is nevertheless harmful or risks serious harm. I also respond to two possible suggestions: that the action is of a kind that violates autonomy; and, that the class of such actions violates autonomy. I suggest that the action is wrongful in as much as it is a bodily trespass. I consider, and criticise, two ways of understanding how morally I stand to my own body: as owner and as sovereign. In respect of the latter I consider Arthur Ripstein's recent defence of a sovereignty principle. Finally I criticise an attempt by Joel Feinberg to explain bodily trespass in terms of personal autonomy.
Date
2008Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Informed Consent and the Grounds of Autonomy
Archard, David (2007)