Phenomenology of Religious Experience 3: Visuality, Imagination, and the Lifeworld. Phenomenology of Sacrifice in Marion, Patočka and Nancy

0518374 - FLÚ 2020 RIV PL eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Kouba, Petr
Phenomenology of Religious Experience 3: Visuality, Imagination, and the Lifeworld. Phenomenology of Sacrifice in Marion, Patočka and Nancy.
Open Theology. Roč. 5, č. 1 (2019), s. 377-385. ISSN 2300-6579
Grant CEP: GA ČR(CZ) GA16-23046S
Institucionální podpora: RVO:67985955
Klíčová slova: the unsacrificeable * coexistence * terrorism * politics * religion
Obor OECD: Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Způsob publikování: Open access
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opth.2019.5.issue-1/opth-2019-0027/opth-2019-0027.xml?format=INT

The phenomenon of sacrifice has been analyzed by Hegel, Kierkegaard, Bataille and many other philosophers. In my paper I intend to examine this phenomenon from the phenomenological point of view as outlined by Jan Patočka, Jean-Luc Nancy and Jean-Luc Marion. With their help I differentiate several kinds of sacrifice (strategic, moral, political, and religious), but above all, I am interested in the limits of sacrifice. Provided that the fields of morality, politics and religion are opened by sacrifice, is there any morality, politics and religion without one? And if so, what is the meaning of morality, politics and religion that are not based on some kind of sacrifice? These questions seem essential in our time, when the meaning of sacrifice is compromised by acts of terrorism. It is relatively easy to denounce terrorism and its propaganda, which uses the concept of martyrdom, as an inauthentic approach to the experience of sacrifice (Marion). But how can we break its spell if we believe that sacrifice brings our existence to completeness (Patočka)? How can we avoid inauthentic forms of sacrifice, if we believe that without sacrifice we must fall into nihilism and indifference?
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0303530