臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討成年子女與其嬰兒潮世代父母之代間關係。運用華人家庭動態資料庫2008年至2012年五波追蹤調查資料，採潛在類型成長分析策略，以成年子女角度出發，探究代間居住安排與代間金錢支持交換的變化，並聚焦兩代的生命事件，檢視其與代間關係之關聯。進一步，分析代間居住安排與代間金錢支持交換的變化，與成年子女生活福祉之關聯。主要之研究發現如下：
一、代間同住比例高，尤其是成年兒子。代間居住安排的變化呈現不同類型，成年兒子與成年女兒變化類型相同，均為「持續同住型」、「代間持續不同住型」、「同住變不同住型」與「不同住變同住型」四種型態。成年子女的結婚、生育事件，影響代間居住安排變化。 成年子女結婚使代間居住安排傾向成為「持續不同住型」，而成年兒子新添子女時，代間居住方式則傾向成為「同住變不同住型」。
二、逾半數成年子女提供嬰兒潮世代父母金錢支持協助。成年兒子與女兒與父母的代間金錢支持變化類型不同，成年兒子與其嬰兒潮父母的代間金錢支持交換類型變化為「持續提供型」、「持續無交換型」、「無交換變提供型」與「提供變無交換型」四類型，而成年女兒則是「持續提供型」、「無交換變提供型」、「互惠變提供型」與「提供變無交換型」。成年子女就業影響代間金錢支持交換變化。有工作的成年兒子傾向成為「持續提供型」。
三、代間關係變化與成年兒子的生活福祉未有顯著關聯，而成年女兒則具顯著影響。

This research aimed to examine the intergenerational relationships between adult children and their baby boomer parents. Taking the perspectives of adult children, five waves of data (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012) from the Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) were analyzed. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) was used to develop changes types of intergenerational living arrangements and intergenerational financial support exchange. Focus on the life events of the two generations, this research examined the effect on intergenerational relationships changes pattern.. Furthermore, the study analyzed how the changes of intergenerational living arrangements and the intergenerational financial support exchange affect adult children’s personal well-being. The main findings are as follow:
1.The proportion of intergenerational co-residence is high, especially between adult sons and their parents. There are different types of changes of intergenerational living arrangements. The four types of changes of intergenerational living arrangements for adult sons and daughters are the same: “continuous co-residence,” “continuous non-co-residence,” “from co-residence to non-co-residence,” and “from non-co-residence to co-residence.” Adult children’s life events such as getting married and having children affect changes of intergenerational living arrangements. After marrying, the intergenerational living arrangement between adult children and their parents is inclined to be the “continuous non- co-residence” type. When adult sons have newborn babies, the living arrangement is inclined to be “from co-residence to non-co-residence.”
2.More than half of the adult children provide financial support to their baby boomer parents. Different types of changes of intergenerational financial support exist between adult sons and daughters. The four types of changes of exchange of intergenerational financial support between adult sons and their baby boomer parents are: “continuous provision,” “continuous low-exchange,” “from low-exchange to provision,” and “from provision to low-exchange.” As to adult daughters and their parents, there are also four types, “continuous provision,” “from low-exchange to provision,” “from reciprocity to provision,” and “from provision to low-exchange.” Adult children’s employment status affect changes of exchange of intergenerational financial support. When adult sons have jobs, the type of intergenerational financial support they give to parents is inclined to be the “continuous provision” type.
3.There is no significant effect between changes of intergenerational relationships and the adult sons' well-being. To adult daughters, changes of intergenerational relationships and personal well-being are related.

第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究緣起……………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題………………………………5
第三節 名詞釋義……………………………………………………7
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………10
第一節 嬰兒潮世代的代間關係…………………………10
第二節 生命歷程觀點與代間關係……………………22
第三節 代間關係與成年子女的生活福祉………32
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………36
第一節 研究取向……………………………………………………36
第二節 資料來源與研究對象………………………………39
第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………42
第四節 研究假設……………………………………………………43
第五節 研究變項測量……………………………………………45
第六節 資料處理方法……………………………………………53
第四章 研究結果……………………………………………………55
第一節 生命事件與代間居住安排的變化…………55
第二節 生命事件與代間金錢支持交換的變化…67
第三節 代間關係與成年子女的生活福祉…………78
第五章 討論與建議…………………………………………………84
第一節 結論與討論…………………………………………………84
第二節 建議………………………………………………………… 92
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………… 96

中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心（2014）。華人家庭動態資料庫計畫。2014年1月21日，取自http://psfd.sinica.edu.tw/index.htm
中央研究院社會學研究所（2015）。臺灣青少年成長歷程研究。2015年5月21日，取自http://www.typ.sinica.edu.tw/
內政部戶政司（2013）。內政部百年人口歷年資料。2013年4月10日，取自：http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346
內政部統計處（2014）。內政統計通報。2015年7月20日，取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=8647
王俊豪（2008）。臺灣初婚夫妻的居住安排。人口學刊，37，45-85。
王濟川、郭志剛（2004）。Logistic迴歸模型—方法及應用。臺北市：五南。
王叢桂、羅國英（2013）。嬰兒潮世代退休時期的心理需求與價值：關係主義取向。本土心理學研究，39，3-63。
伊慶春（2014）。臺灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變：資源與規範的交互作用。社會學研究，3，189-215。
伊慶春、章英華（2008）。父系家庭的持續與變遷：臺灣的家庭社會學研究，1960-2000。載於謝國雄（主編），群學爭鳴：臺灣社會學發展史（23-73頁）。臺北市：群學。
行政院（2012）。社會指標年報。2016年8月25日，取自https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/31014112722YWQ0W6Y9.pdf
行政院主計總處(2015)。國民幸福指數年報，2016年9月9日，取自http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/51020172646J20L2DJ5. pdf
行政院經濟建設委員會（2012）。2012年至2060年人口推計。2013年8月25日，取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?s No=000045
行政院經濟建設委員會（2014）。中華民國人口推計 （103至150年）。2016年2月25日，取自http://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_ List.aspx?n=84223C65B6F94D72
李瑞金、盧羿廷（2005）。嬰兒潮世代婦女老年生活準備之初探與因應。社區發展季刊，110，111-127。
周玉慧（2015）。青少年至成年初期親子關係的變化及其影響。中華心理學刊，56（1），67-89。
周玉慧（2016）。代間支持與代間衝突對年輕夫妻之影響。論文發表於中央研究院社會學研究所舉辦之「2016臺灣青少年成長歷程研討會──成年初期的發展」（頁1-23），臺北市。
周玉慧、吳明燁、黃朗文（2010）。當中年遇到青少年：親子關係類型與父母中年生活感受。臺灣社會學刊，20，1-37。
林子鏞、喬芷（2013）。父母需要子女的關心：探討臺灣中老年人的代間關係與主觀經濟壓力之相關性研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，32，6，599-612。
林如萍（2012）。臺灣家庭的代間關係與互動類型。載於伊慶春、章英華（主編），臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005：婚姻與家庭，臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一（頁75-124）。臺北市：中央研究院。
林如萍（2013）。三代之間：代間關係與中年生活福祉。論文發表於中央研究院舉辦之「家庭的正向力量：臺灣社會變遷基本調查第十九次研討會」第十九次研討會會議論文集（頁1-30），臺北市。
林如萍（2014）。疏離的世代？不同住世代之代際交換分析。載於陳午晴、汪建華（主編），家庭與性別評論第5輯（頁86-105）。北京市：社會科學文獻出版社。
林如萍、伊慶春（2007）。規範、情感、交換？成年子女與老年父母的代間支持。論文發表於「家庭價值、行為與態度：臺灣社會變遷基本調查第九次研討會」，臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。
林如萍、黃秋華（2016）。｢養『兒』防老」？成年子女與父母代間支持交換類型的變化：性別差異分析。論文發表於「兩岸家庭研究研討會」，臺北市：中央研究院。
林佳瑩、蔡毓智（2003）。臺灣地區不同世代生命週期中重大生活變遷之比較性研究。論文發表於「臺灣社會學會年會暨『邁向新世紀的公平社會－社群、風險與不平等』研討會」，臺北：政治大學。
邱皓政（2008）。潛在類別模式－原理與技術。臺北：五南。
張桂霖、張金鶚（2010）。老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換：家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討。人口學刊，40，41-90。
章英華（1994）。變遷社會中的家戶組成與奉養態度—臺灣的例子。臺灣大學社會學刊，23，1-34。
章英華、于若蓉（2014）。家庭結構的持續與變遷：海峽兩岸的老年人居住安排的比較。社會學研究，3，167-188。
陳正昌（2006）。教育基礎研究的兩個量化基礎-資料庫及統計。論文發表於「教育專業發展：教育研究理論與實務之整合學術研討會」，高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
陳建良（2005）。親子居住安排在家庭內與跨家戶成員間的權力互動。住宅學報，14（2），51-82。
曾瀝儀、張金鶚、陳淑美（2006）。老人居住安排選擇—代間關係之探討。住宅學報，15（2），45-64。
楊靜利、陳寬政、李大正（2012）。近二十年來的家庭結構變遷。載於伊慶春、章英華（主編），臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005：家庭與婚姻，臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一（頁1-28）。臺北市：中央研究院。
葉光輝（2009）。臺灣民眾的代間交換行為：從孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究，31，97-141。
董旭英、黃儀娟（2000）。次級資料研究法。臺北：弘智。
廖培珊（2014）。國民幸福指數調查暨主觀幸福感研究期末報告。行政院主計總處編印。2016年10月20日，取自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/521610483ZXKUP4S8.pdf
衛生福利部（2013）。老人狀況調查報告。2016年10月25日，取自http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312 & fod_list_no=4695
魯慧中、鄭保志（2012）。孝道的認同與實踐－以「成年兒子與父母同住決策」為分析對象。人口學刊，45，111-154。
薛承泰（2003）。臺灣地區人口特質與趨勢：對社會福利政策的幾個啟示。國家政策季刊，3（4），3-22。
簡文吟（2001）。父系社會下的從女居現象-臺灣與上海的比較研究。婦女與兩性學刊，12，65-94.
Allen, K. R., Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A. (2000). Family in the Middle and Later Years: A Review and Critique of Research in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 911-926.
Aquilino, W. S.(1997). From Adolescent to Young Adult: A Prospective Study of Parent-Child Relations During the Transition to Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family , 59 (3), 670-686.
Attias-Donfut, C., & Arber S. (2000). Equity and Solidarity Across the Generations. In S. Arber & C. Attias-Donfut (Eds), The Family and State in Ageing Societies, (pp. 1–21). London, England: Routledge.
Attias-Donfut, C., & Wolff, F. C. (2000). The Redistributive Effects Of Generational Transfers. In S. Arbur & C. Attias-Donfut (Eds.), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies (pp. 22–46). New York: Routledge.
Bengston, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The Life Course Perspective Applied to Families over Time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Scham, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of Families, Theories and Methods: a Contextual Approach (pp.469-499). New York: Plenum.
Bengston, V. L., Rosenthal, C. J., & Burton, L. M. (1990). Families and aging: Diversity and heterogeneity. In. Binstock, RH and George, L.(Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences.
Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1-16.
Bengtson, V. L., & Schrader S. S. (1982). Parent-Child Relations. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson(Eds.), Research Instruments in Social Gerontology (pp. 115-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bengtson, V. L., & Silverstein, M. (1993). Families, aging, and social change: Seven agendas for 21st-century researchers. Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, 13(1), 15-38.
Bengtson, V. L., Elder G. H., & Putney, N. M. (2005). The Life Course Perspective on Ageing: Linked Lives, Timing, and History. In M. L. Johnson, V. L. Bengtson, P. Coleman $ T. Kirkwood(Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing (pp. 493–501). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bengtson, V.L. & Black, K.D. (1973). Intergeneration Relations and Continuities in Socialization. In P. Baltes & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialization (pp.207-234). New York: Academic Press.
Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (2005). Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe – First Results from the Survey of Health,Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).
Brubaker, T. H., & Brubaker, E. (1992). Family care of the elderly in the United States: An issue of gender differences? In. JI Kosberg (Ed.), Family care of the elderly: Social and cultural changes (pp. 210-231).
Bucx, A. J. E. H. (2009). Linked Lives: Young Adults’ Life Course and Relations with Parents. Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Chen, C. N. (2006). Does the Completeness of a Household-Based Convoy Matter in Intergenerational Support Exchanges? Social Indicators Research, 79, 117-142.
Choi, N. G. (2003). Coresidence between Unmarried Aging Parents and their Adult Children Who Moved in with Whom and Why?. Research on Aging, 25(4), 384-404.
Chu, C. Y., Xie, Y., & Yu, R. R. (2011). Coresidence with elderly parents: A comparative study of southeast China and Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 120-135.
Cochran, L., Rothschadl, A. M , & Rudick, J. L. (2009). Leisure Programming for Baby Boomers. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
DeHart, G., Sroufe, L. A., & Cooper, R. (2004). Child development: Its nature and course (5th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled Out: How Singles are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Dwyer, J. W., & Coward, R. T. (1991). A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. Journal of Gerontology, 46(5), S259-S269.
Elder Jr, G. H., Caspi, A., & Burton, L. M. (1988). Life Transitions in Developmental Perspective: Sociological and Historical Insights on Adolescence. In M. Gunnar & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 151-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elder, G. H. (1984). Families, Kin, and the Life Course-A Sociological-Perspective. Review of child development research, 7, 80-136.
Elder, G. H. Jr. (2000). The Life Course. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp.1614-1622). New York: Macmillan.
Elder, G. H. Jr., Caspi, A., & Downey, G. (1986). Problem Behavior and Family Relationships: Life Course and Intergenerational Themes. In A. Sorensen, F. Weinert, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Human Development and the Life Course: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 293-336). NJ: Erlbaum.
Elder, G. H. Jr., Caspi, A., & Downey, G. (1986). Problem Behavior and Family Relationships: Life Course and Intergenerational Themes. In A. Sorensen, F. Weinert, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Human Development and the Life Course: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 293-336). NJ: Erlbaum.
Elder, G. H. Jr., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. In J. T. Mortimer, J. Staff & S. Oesterle (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (pp. 3-19). New York: Plenum.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1985). Perspectives on the Life Course. In G. H. Elder(Ed.), Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transtions, 1968-1980(pp. 23-49). Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press.
Elder, G. H., Jr., & Johnson, M. K. (2002). The Life Course and Aging: Challenges, Lessons, and New Directions. In R. A. Settersten, (Ed.), Invitation to the Life Course: Toward New Understandings of Later Life, Part II (pp. 49-81). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Fingerman, K. L., Pillemer, K. A., Silverstein, M., & Suitor, J. J. (2012). The Baby Boomers’ Intergenerational Relationships. The Gerontologist, 52(2), 199-209.
Fingerman, K. L., Pitzer, L. M., Chan, W., Birditt, K. S., Franks, M. M., & Zarit, S. (2011). Who Gets What and Why: Help Middle-Aged Adults Provide to Parents and Grown Children. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 66B, 87–98.
Fingerman, K. L., Pitzer, L. M., Chan, W., Birditt, K., Franks, M. M., & Zarit, S. (2010). Who gets what and why? Help middle-aged adults provide to parents and grown children. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(1), 87-98.
Fingerman, K., Miller, L., Birditt, K., & Zarit, S. (2009). Giving to the good and the needy: Parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1220-1233.
Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2010). On a New Schedule: Transitions to Adulthood and Family Change. Future of the Child, 20, 67–87.
Gans, D., & Silverstein, M. (2006). Norms of Filial Responsibility for Aging Parents Across Time and Generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 961-976.
Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: the Good, the Bad, and the Greedy. Contexts, 5, 16-21.
Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J., & Clogg, C. C. (1993). The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1428-1458.
Horowitz, A. (1985). Sons and Daughters as Caregivers to Older Parents: Differences in Role Performance and Consequences. The Gerontologist, 25(6), 612-617.
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Jaakkola, M., & Reuter, A. (2006). Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being among three immigrant groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 293-311.
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317.
Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (1998). Effects of Life Course Transitions on The Quality of Relationships Between Adult Children and Their Parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60 (4),924-938.
Lee, E., Spitze, G., & Logan, J. R. (2003). Social support to parents‐in‐law: The interplay of gender and kin hierarchies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 396-403.
Leopold, T., & Raab, M. (2011). Short Term Reciprocity in Late Parent‐Child Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 105-119.
Lin, I. F., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., Lin, Y. H., Gorrindo, T., & Seeman, T. (2003). Gender Differences in Adult Children’s Support of Their Parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 184-200.
Lin, I.-F. (2008). Consequences of Parental Divorce for Adult Children’s Support of Their Frail Parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 113–128.
Lin, J. P., & Yi, C. C. (2011). Filial norms and intergenerational support to aging parents in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(s1), S109-S120.
Lin, J. P., & Yi, C. C. (2013). A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia. International Sociology, 28(3), 297-315.
Lin, J. P., Chang, T. F., & Huang, C. H. (2011). Intergenerational Relations and Life Satisfaction among Older Women in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20: 47-58.
Logan, J., & Spitze, G. (1996). Family ties: Enduring relations between parents and their grown children. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Macmillan, R. & Copher, R. (2005). Families in the Life Course: Interdependency of Roles, Role Configurations, and Pathways. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 858-879.
Merz, E. M., Schuengel, C., & Schulze, H. J. (2009). Intergenerational Relations Across 4 Years: Well-Being is Affected by Quality, not by Support Exchange. The Gerontologist, 49(4), 536-548.
Mitchell, B. A. (2004). Home, but not alone: Socio-cultural and economic aspects of Canadian young adults sharing parental households. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Sciences, 28, 115–125.
Minguez, A. M. (2013). Family well-being: European perspectives. Social indicators research series, 49. Springer Science & Business Media.
Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2012). Reexamining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well‐Being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1-18.
Owens, T. J., & Suitor, J. J. (Eds.). (2007). Interpersonal relations across the life course (Vol. 12). Elsevier.
Pruchno, R. (2012). Not Your Mother's Old Age: Baby Boomers at Age 65. Gerontologist, 52(2), 149–145.
Riley, M. W., & Riley, J. W. (1994). Age integration and the lives of older people. The Gerontologist, 34(1), 110-115.
Roberts, R. E. L., & Bengtson, V. L. (1993). Relationships with Parents, Self-Esteem, and Psychological Well-Being in Young Adulthood: A Further Examination of Identity Theory. Social Psychological Quarterly, 56, 263-277.
Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2008). Till Marriage Do Us Part: Adult Children’s Relationships with Their Parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 360-376.
Schenk, N., & Dykstra, P. A. (2012). Continuity and change in intergenerational family relationships: An examination of shifts in relationship type over a three-year period. Advances in Life Course Research, 17(3), 121-132.
Schmeeckle, M., Giarrusso, R., Feng, D. and Bengtson, V.L. 2006. What Makes Someone Family? Adult Children’s Perceptions of Current and Former Stepparents. Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 595-610.
Sheng, X., & Killian, T. S. (2009). Over time dynamics of monetary intergenerational exchanges. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 268-281.
Silverstein, M. (1995). Stability and Change in Temporal Distance Between the Elderly and Their Children. Demography, 32(1), 29-45.
Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational Solidarity and the Structure of Adult Child‐Parent Relationships in American Families 1. American journal of Sociology, 103(2), 429-60.
Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R., & Bengtson, V. L. (2002). Reciprocity in Parent–Child Relations over the Adult Life Course. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(1), S3-S13.
Silverstein, M., Gans, D., & Yang, F. M. (2006). Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents the Role of Norms and Needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1068-1084.
Silverstein, M., Parrott, T. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1995). Factors That Predispose Middle-Aged Sons and Daughters to Provide Social Support to Older Parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 465-475.
Smits, A., Van Gaalen, R. I., & Mulder, C. H. (2010). Parent–child coresidence: Who moves in with whom and for whose needs?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 1022-1033.
Spitze, G., & Logan, J. (1990). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational social support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 420-430.
Spitze, G., Ward, R., Deane, G., & Zhuo, Y. (2012). Cross-Sibling Effects in Parent-Adult Child Exchanges of Socioemotional Support. Research on Aging, 34(2), 197-221.
Swartz, T. T. (2009). Intergenerational family relations in adulthood: Patterns, variations, and implications in the contemporary United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 191-212.
Szydlik, M. (2008). Intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 97-114.
Tao, H. L. (2014). Why Do Women Interact with Their Parents More Often than Men? The Demonstration Effect Vs. the Biological Effect. The Social Science Journal, 51(3), 350-360.
Treas, J., & Lawton, L. (1999). Family Relations in Adulthood. In M.Sussman, S.Steinmetz, & G.Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 425-438). New York: Plenum Press.
Treboux, D., Crowell, J. A., & Waters, E. (2004). When" new" meets" old": configurations of adult attachment representations and their implications for marital functioning. Developmental psychology, 40(2), 295.
Ward, E., DeSantis, C., Robbins, A., Kohler, B., & Jemal, A. (2014). Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 64(2), 83-103.
Ward, R. A. (2008). Multiple parent–adult child relations and well-being in middle and later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(4), S239-S247.
Whitbourne, S.K. & Wills, S.L. (2006). The Baby Boomers Grow up: Contemporary Perspectives on Midlife. Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
White, L., & Edwards, J. N. (1990). Emptying the Nest and Parental Well-Being: An Analysis of National Panel Data. American Sociological Review, 55, 235-242.
Wolf, D. A., Freedman, V., & Soldo, B. J. (1997). The Division of Family Labor: Care for Elderly Parents. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(Special Issue), 102-109.
Wu, M. Y. (2013). The concept of guan in the Chinese parent-child relationship. In In Chin-Chun Yi (ed.) The psychological well-being of east Asian youth: Transition from Adolescence to Early Adulthood (pp. 29-49). Springer Netherlands.
Yamada, M. (2001). Parasite singles feed on family system. Japan Quarterly, 48(1), 10.
Yi, C. C., & Lin, J. P. (2009). Types of relations between adult children and elderly parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms accounting for various relational types. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 305-324.
Yieh, K., Tsai, Y. F., & Kuo, C. Y. (2004). An exploratory study of “parasites” in Taiwan. Journal of family and economic issues, 25(4), 527-539.
Zissimopoulos, J. (2001). Resource transfers to the elderly: Do adult children substitute financial transfers for time transfers (No. RAND/DRU-2542). RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA.