BACKGROUND. The authors undertook a prospective evaluation of the clinical value of 2-fluoro [18-1-2·deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma compared with computed tomography (CT) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB). METHODS. Fifty-two consecutive patients with untreated malignant lymphoma were evaluated prospectively in a bicenter study. FDG-PET, CT, and BMB were performed for investigating lymph node/extranodal manifestations and bone marrow infiltration. Thirty-three percnt of the discrepant results were verified by biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, or clinical follow-up (range, 4-24 month). RESULTS. Altogether, 1297 anatomic regions (lymph nodes, organs, and bone marrow) were evaluated. FDG-PET and CT scans were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the BOC curve were as follows: lymph nodes, 0.996 (PET) and 0.916 (CT); extranodal, 0.999 (PET) and 0.916 (CT); supradiaphragmatic, 0.996 (PET) and 0.905 (CT); and infradiaphragmatic, 0.999 (PET) and 0.952 (CT). In these analyses, FDG·PET was significantly superior to CT (P < 0.05), except in infradiaphragmatic regions, in which the two methods produced equivalent results. In detecting bone marrow infiltration, FDG-PET was superior to CT and was equivalent to BMB. In 4 of 52 patients (8%), FDG-PET led to an upstaging and a change of therapy. CONCLUSIONS. Noninvasive FDG-PET is very accurate in the staging of malignant lymphoma. Compared with standard staging modalities (CT and BMB), PET was significantly superior and led to changes in the therapy regimen for 8% of patients

2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma: A bicenter trial

TREVISAN, GIUSTO;
2001-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The authors undertook a prospective evaluation of the clinical value of 2-fluoro [18-1-2·deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma compared with computed tomography (CT) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB). METHODS. Fifty-two consecutive patients with untreated malignant lymphoma were evaluated prospectively in a bicenter study. FDG-PET, CT, and BMB were performed for investigating lymph node/extranodal manifestations and bone marrow infiltration. Thirty-three percnt of the discrepant results were verified by biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, or clinical follow-up (range, 4-24 month). RESULTS. Altogether, 1297 anatomic regions (lymph nodes, organs, and bone marrow) were evaluated. FDG-PET and CT scans were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the BOC curve were as follows: lymph nodes, 0.996 (PET) and 0.916 (CT); extranodal, 0.999 (PET) and 0.916 (CT); supradiaphragmatic, 0.996 (PET) and 0.905 (CT); and infradiaphragmatic, 0.999 (PET) and 0.952 (CT). In these analyses, FDG·PET was significantly superior to CT (P < 0.05), except in infradiaphragmatic regions, in which the two methods produced equivalent results. In detecting bone marrow infiltration, FDG-PET was superior to CT and was equivalent to BMB. In 4 of 52 patients (8%), FDG-PET led to an upstaging and a change of therapy. CONCLUSIONS. Noninvasive FDG-PET is very accurate in the staging of malignant lymphoma. Compared with standard staging modalities (CT and BMB), PET was significantly superior and led to changes in the therapy regimen for 8% of patients
2001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035281784&partnerID=40&md5=9cc9ccd13397e929885b82e21a92518d
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2631674
 Avviso

Registrazione in corso di verifica.
La registrazione di questo prodotto non è ancora stata validata in ArTS.

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 24
  • Scopus 238
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact