Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic relevance of the measurement of the cardiac natriuretic peptides: a review

Summary Background Pathophysiological and clinical relevance of cardiac natriuretic hormone (CNH) assay has been investigated by a great deal of experimental and clinical studies. Authors sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic relevance of the measurement of CNHs according to the evidence-laboratory medicine principles. Methods In June 2003, a computerized literature search on National Library of Medicine using keyword "ANP" and "BNP" found more than 12.300 and 1200 articles, respectively. A more refined search with keywords "ANP or BNP assay" extracted about 7000 and 800 articles, respectively. Only studies specifically designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic relevance of CNH measurement were selected from this huge mass of articles to be discussed in this review. Content Several studies suggested that CNH assay may be clinically useful: for the screening and classification of patients with heart failure, as a prognostic marker in cardiovascular disease, in the follow-up of patients with heart failure, and also because it may reduce the need for further cardiac investigation. However, it is difficult to compare, even the best well-designed studies, because not only they evaluated different populations, but they also used different gold standards. Conclusions CNH assay and conventional diagnostic work-up provide complementary information for the evaluation of presence and severity of cardiac dysfunction and clinical disease. Several aspects of CNH assay are still to be delucidated, and further work is still needed to carefully assess its diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value in cardiac disease.