Lies, damned lies… and metrics
Other
2011-11
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
University of Cape Town. OpenUCT
University of Cape Town
Series
Abstract
Two contradictory things are happening side by side in discussion of scholarly publishing right now. On the one hand, the discourse of open access – seeking to remedy the failures of the current system – bases itself overwhelmingly on the value of the journal article as the artefact to be made open, while at the same time, stronger and stronger criticisms are levelled against journals as an effective mode of scientific communication. Questions are also being asked about the appropriateness of the metrics that are used to make judgements on the quality of the articles published, determining the reputation of authors and their institutions. It is well known that this system consigns developing country research to the periphery of a ‘global' system, marginalising very important research issues – such as ‘neglected diseases' that apply to large percentages of the world's population. These concerns now appear to have a strong echo in the mainstream, even if the perspective of the global South is not clearly articulated in the discussion.
Description
Reference:
Gray, E. 2011-11. Lies, damned lies… and metrics. Other. University of Cape Town. OpenUCT.