A ironia e sua refrações: um estudo sobre a dissonância na paródia e no riso
Carregando...
Data
2008-09-18
Autores
Alavarce, Camila da Silva [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O presente trabalho concentra-se no estudo dos discursos caracterizados pela dissonância, mais especificamente, a ironia, a paródia e o riso. Em primeiro lugar, foram estudadas as especificidades de cada uma dessas modalidades e chegou-se à conclusão de que tais discursos são sempre constituídos pela tensão, pelo embate de vozes dissonantes. Em relação à ironia, trata-se de uma categoria que, além de se originar a partir da sobreposição de vozes antagônicas, provoca sensações também contraditórias naqueles que a “experimentam”, a partir do momento em que ocorre. Embora também reproduza um choque e se configure como resultado de uma diferença de postura entre dois planos, a paródia distancia-se, no presente trabalho, da visão tradicional de “canto ridicularizador”, funcionando, ao contrário, como uma inscrição de continuidade histórico-literária e atuando na revisão crítica de discursos anteriores. Em relação ao riso, foram privilegiadas as teorias de Schopenhauer, Baudelaire e Jean Paul, já que são estudos que proporcionam uma aproximação estrutural e filosófica entre os fenômenos do riso e os discursos irônicos e paródicos. Desse modo, tal qual a ironia e a paródia, esse riso é também fruto de uma dissonância, instaurando, ao invés da certeza, a possibilidade, em lugar do uníssono, o ambivalente. O estudo dos significativos pontos de contato entre a ironia, a paródia e o riso legitima a relevância do sujeito na decodificação desses discursos caracterizados pela ambigüidade. Assim, o receptor de textos irônicos, paródicos ou marcados pelo riso é valorizado na medida em que é julgado capaz de perceber a dissonância subjacente a esses discursos. Além desse ponto de contato entre as modalidades analisadas – o leitor – foram traçadas comparações importantes entre a paródia e a ironia romântica...
This study focuses on the study of discourses characterized by dissonance, more specifically, the irony, the parody and the laugh. At First, we studied the specifics of each one of these terms and came to the conclusion that these discourses are always made by tension by the clash of dissonant voices. In relation to the irony, this is a category that besides to originate from the overlap of antagonistic voices, provokes sensations that also contradicting on that who experience from the moment they occur. While also reproduce a shock and it is set as a result of a difference of attitude between two planes, the parody distances itself in this work, the traditional view of “ mocked corner, working, on the contrary, as a recording of continuity historical literary and working in a critical review of previous discourses Regarding the laugh, they were inside the theories of Schopenhauer, Baudelaire and Jean Paul, as they are studies that provide a structural and philosophical approach between the phenomena of laugh and ironic and parodies discourses. Thus, as the irony and parody, that laugh is also the result of a dissonance, introducing, instead of certainty the possibility, instead of unison, the ambivalent. The study of the significant points of contact between the irony, parody and laugh legitimizes the relevance of the subject in the decoding of these discourses characterized by ambiguity. Thus, the receptor of ironic and parody texts and marked by laugh is valued as while it is judged able to understand the dissonance subjacent to these discourses. Beyond this point of contact between the modalities discussed - the reader - they were drawn important comparisons between the parody and the romantic irony, and yet, among the object categories of this study and the issue of mimesis so inviting. They chose three texts for the application of this theory: o homem duplicado...(Complete abstract click electronic access below)
This study focuses on the study of discourses characterized by dissonance, more specifically, the irony, the parody and the laugh. At First, we studied the specifics of each one of these terms and came to the conclusion that these discourses are always made by tension by the clash of dissonant voices. In relation to the irony, this is a category that besides to originate from the overlap of antagonistic voices, provokes sensations that also contradicting on that who experience from the moment they occur. While also reproduce a shock and it is set as a result of a difference of attitude between two planes, the parody distances itself in this work, the traditional view of “ mocked corner, working, on the contrary, as a recording of continuity historical literary and working in a critical review of previous discourses Regarding the laugh, they were inside the theories of Schopenhauer, Baudelaire and Jean Paul, as they are studies that provide a structural and philosophical approach between the phenomena of laugh and ironic and parodies discourses. Thus, as the irony and parody, that laugh is also the result of a dissonance, introducing, instead of certainty the possibility, instead of unison, the ambivalent. The study of the significant points of contact between the irony, parody and laugh legitimizes the relevance of the subject in the decoding of these discourses characterized by ambiguity. Thus, the receptor of ironic and parody texts and marked by laugh is valued as while it is judged able to understand the dissonance subjacent to these discourses. Beyond this point of contact between the modalities discussed - the reader - they were drawn important comparisons between the parody and the romantic irony, and yet, among the object categories of this study and the issue of mimesis so inviting. They chose three texts for the application of this theory: o homem duplicado...(Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Ironia, Parodia, Riso, Irony
Como citar
ALAVARCE, Camila da Silva. A ironia e sua refrações: um estudo sobre a dissonância na paródia e no riso. 2008. 212 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Araraquara, 2008.