Surveys enquiring about burden of headache over a prior period of time (e.g., 3 months) are subject to recall bias. To eliminate this as far as possible, we focused on presence and impact of headache on the preceding day ("headache yesterday").Adults (18-65 years) were surveyed from the general populations of Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, from a work-force population in Spain and from mostly non-headache patient populations of Austria, France and U.K. A study of non-responders in some countries allowed detection of potential participation bias where initial participation rates were low.Participation rates varied between 11\% and 59\% (mean 27\%). Non-responder studies suggested that, because of participation bias, headache prevalence might be overestimated in initial responders by up to 2\% (absolute). Across all countries, 1,422 of 8,271 participants (15-17\%, depending on correction for participation bias) had headache yesterday lasting on average for 6 hours. It was bad or very bad in 56\% of cases and caused absence from work or school in 6\%. Among those who worked despite headache, 20\% reported productivity reduced by >50\%. Social activities were lost by 24\%. Women (21\%) were more likely than men (12\%) to have headache yesterday, but impact was similar in the two genders.With recall biases avoided, our findings indicate that headache costs at least 0.7\% of working capacity in Europe. This calculation takes into account that most of those who missed work could make up for this later, which, however, means that leisure and social activities are even more influenced by headache.

Headache yesterday in Europe.

TASSORELLI, CRISTINA;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Surveys enquiring about burden of headache over a prior period of time (e.g., 3 months) are subject to recall bias. To eliminate this as far as possible, we focused on presence and impact of headache on the preceding day ("headache yesterday").Adults (18-65 years) were surveyed from the general populations of Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, from a work-force population in Spain and from mostly non-headache patient populations of Austria, France and U.K. A study of non-responders in some countries allowed detection of potential participation bias where initial participation rates were low.Participation rates varied between 11\% and 59\% (mean 27\%). Non-responder studies suggested that, because of participation bias, headache prevalence might be overestimated in initial responders by up to 2\% (absolute). Across all countries, 1,422 of 8,271 participants (15-17\%, depending on correction for participation bias) had headache yesterday lasting on average for 6 hours. It was bad or very bad in 56\% of cases and caused absence from work or school in 6\%. Among those who worked despite headache, 20\% reported productivity reduced by >50\%. Social activities were lost by 24\%. Women (21\%) were more likely than men (12\%) to have headache yesterday, but impact was similar in the two genders.With recall biases avoided, our findings indicate that headache costs at least 0.7\% of working capacity in Europe. This calculation takes into account that most of those who missed work could make up for this later, which, however, means that leisure and social activities are even more influenced by headache.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/987422
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact