Existing scales for rating the severity of blepharospasm (BSP) are limited by a number of potential drawbacks. We therefore developed and validated a novel scale for rating the severity of BSP. The development of the scale started with careful examination of the clinical spectrum of the condition by a panel of experts who selected phenomenological aspects thought to be relevant to disease severity. Thereafter, selected items were first checked for reliability, then reliable items were combined to generate the scale, and clinimetric properties of the scale were evaluated. Finally, the confidence with which the scale could be used by people without high levels of movement disorders skill was assessed. The new scale, based on objective criteria, yielded moderate to almost perfect reliability, acceptable internal consistency, satisfactory scaling assumptions, lack of floor and ceiling effects, partial correlations with a prior severity scale and with a quality of life scale, and good sensitivity to change. Despite a few limitations, the foregoing features make the novel scale more suitable than existing scales to assess the severity of BSP in natural history and pathophysiologic studies as well as in clinical trials.

Development and validation of a clinical scale for rating the severity of blepharospasm / Defazio, Giovanni; Hallett, Mark; Jinnah, Hyder A; Stebbins, Glenn T; Gigante, Angelo F; Ferrazzano, Gina; Conte, Antonella; Fabbrini, Giovanni; Berardelli, Alfredo. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS. - ISSN 0885-3185. - 30:4(2015), pp. 525-530. [10.1002/mds.26156]

Development and validation of a clinical scale for rating the severity of blepharospasm

FERRAZZANO, GINA;CONTE, ANTONELLA;FABBRINI, Giovanni;BERARDELLI, Alfredo
2015

Abstract

Existing scales for rating the severity of blepharospasm (BSP) are limited by a number of potential drawbacks. We therefore developed and validated a novel scale for rating the severity of BSP. The development of the scale started with careful examination of the clinical spectrum of the condition by a panel of experts who selected phenomenological aspects thought to be relevant to disease severity. Thereafter, selected items were first checked for reliability, then reliable items were combined to generate the scale, and clinimetric properties of the scale were evaluated. Finally, the confidence with which the scale could be used by people without high levels of movement disorders skill was assessed. The new scale, based on objective criteria, yielded moderate to almost perfect reliability, acceptable internal consistency, satisfactory scaling assumptions, lack of floor and ceiling effects, partial correlations with a prior severity scale and with a quality of life scale, and good sensitivity to change. Despite a few limitations, the foregoing features make the novel scale more suitable than existing scales to assess the severity of BSP in natural history and pathophysiologic studies as well as in clinical trials.
2015
blepharospasm; blinking; dystonia; rating scale; severity; blepharospasm; humans; reproducibility of results; severity of Illness Index
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Development and validation of a clinical scale for rating the severity of blepharospasm / Defazio, Giovanni; Hallett, Mark; Jinnah, Hyder A; Stebbins, Glenn T; Gigante, Angelo F; Ferrazzano, Gina; Conte, Antonella; Fabbrini, Giovanni; Berardelli, Alfredo. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS. - ISSN 0885-3185. - 30:4(2015), pp. 525-530. [10.1002/mds.26156]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Defazio_development-validation-blepharospasm_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 318.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
318.11 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/854477
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact