The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate anorectal manometric findings in hemorrhoid patients and to evaluate the clinical benefits and physiological consequences of additioning a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy. Anorectal manometry was preoperatively performed in forty-eight consecutive patients with prolapsed piles; resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. Ten healthy volunteers served as controls. Six patients were excluded because no raised and pressures were found. Forty-two patients were randomised: Group 1 (n = 22) patients underwent haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; Group 2 (n = 20) patients underwent haemorrhoidectomy alone. Postoperative course was carefully evaluated; all patients were questioned about continence and anorectal manometry was repeated twice. Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned into the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Postoperative course was better in LIS group. Anal stricture was seen in four patients without sphincterotomy; no patients with LIS experienced and incontinence. This study shows that high and pressures are very frequent in hemorrhoid patients; they are not due to hypertensive and cushions and might have a pathogenetic role. Anorectal manometry is very useful to identify patients with raised anal pressures; in these cases additioning a lateral internal sphincterotomy to haemorrhoidectomy seems justified; it significantly improves postoperative course and can be safely performed.

The usefulness of lateral internal sphincterotomy combined with hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a randomized prospective study

GALIZIA, Gennaro;LIETO, Eva;
2000

Abstract

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate anorectal manometric findings in hemorrhoid patients and to evaluate the clinical benefits and physiological consequences of additioning a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy. Anorectal manometry was preoperatively performed in forty-eight consecutive patients with prolapsed piles; resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. Ten healthy volunteers served as controls. Six patients were excluded because no raised and pressures were found. Forty-two patients were randomised: Group 1 (n = 22) patients underwent haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; Group 2 (n = 20) patients underwent haemorrhoidectomy alone. Postoperative course was carefully evaluated; all patients were questioned about continence and anorectal manometry was repeated twice. Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned into the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Postoperative course was better in LIS group. Anal stricture was seen in four patients without sphincterotomy; no patients with LIS experienced and incontinence. This study shows that high and pressures are very frequent in hemorrhoid patients; they are not due to hypertensive and cushions and might have a pathogenetic role. Anorectal manometry is very useful to identify patients with raised anal pressures; in these cases additioning a lateral internal sphincterotomy to haemorrhoidectomy seems justified; it significantly improves postoperative course and can be safely performed.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/189910
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact