English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Hysteresis as an implicit prior in tactile spatial decision making

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons20047

Thiel,  Sabrina D.
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons19554

Bitzer,  Sebastian
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19892

Nierhaus,  Till
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons19762

Kalberlah,  Christian
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons98584

Preusser,  Sven
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19887

Neumann,  Jane
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons20065

Villringer,  Arno
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons19926

Pleger,  Burkhard
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Germany;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Thiel_et_al._2014_Hysteresis.pdf
(Publisher version), 805KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Thiel, S. D., Bitzer, S., Nierhaus, T., Kalberlah, C., Preusser, S., Neumann, J., et al. (2014). Hysteresis as an implicit prior in tactile spatial decision making. PLoS One, 9(2): e89802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089802.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0015-8182-C
Abstract
Perceptual decisions not only depend on the incoming information from sensory systems but constitute a combination of
current sensory evidence and internally accumulated information from past encounters. Although recent evidence
emphasizes the fundamental role of prior knowledge for perceptual decision making, only few studies have quantified the
relevance of such priors on perceptual decisions and examined their interplay with other decision-relevant factors, such as
the stimulus properties. In the present study we asked whether hysteresis, describing the stability of a percept despite a
change in stimulus property and known to occur at perceptual thresholds, also acts as a form of an implicit prior in tactile
spatial decision making, supporting the stability of a decision across successively presented random stimuli (i.e., decision
hysteresis). We applied a variant of the classical 2-point discrimination task and found that hysteresis influenced perceptual
decision making: Participants were more likely to decide ‘same’ rather than ‘different’ on successively presented pin
distances. In a direct comparison between the influence of applied pin distances (explicit stimulus property) and hysteresis,
we found that on average, stimulus property explained significantly more variance of participants’ decisions than hysteresis.
However, when focusing on pin distances at threshold, we found a trend for hysteresis to explain more variance.
Furthermore, the less variance was explained by the pin distance on a given decision, the more variance was explained by
hysteresis, and vice versa. Our findings suggest that hysteresis acts as an implicit prior in tactile spatial decision making that
becomes increasingly important when explicit stimulus properties provide decreasing evidence.