English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Eclipse Attacks on Overlay Networks: Threats and Defenses

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons180362

Singh,  Atul
Group P. Druschel, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons144511

Druschel,  Peter
Group P. Druschel, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Singh, A., Ngan, T.-W.-"., Druschel, P., & Wallach, D. S. (2006). Eclipse Attacks on Overlay Networks: Threats and Defenses. In 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2006). Barcelona, Spain: IEEE.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-8C7D-9
Abstract
Overlay networks are widely used to deploy functionality at edge nodes without changing network routers. Each node in an overlay network maintains connections with a number of peers, forming a graph upon which a distributed application or service is implemented. In an “Eclipse” attack, a set of malicious, colluding overlay nodes arranges for a correct node to peer only with members of the coalition. If successful, the attacker can mediate most or all communication to and from the victim. Furthermore, by supplying biased neighbor information during normal overlay maintenance, a modest number of malicious nodes can eclipse a large number of correct victim nodes. This paper studies the impact of Eclipse attacks on structured overlays and shows the limitations of known defenses. We then present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a new defense, in which nodes anonymously audit each other’s connectivity. The key observation is that a node that mounts an Eclipse attack must have a higher than average node degree. We show that enforcing a node degree limit by auditing is an effective defense against Eclipse attacks. Furthermore, unlike most existing defenses, our defense leaves flexibility in the selection of neighboring nodes, thus permitting important overlay optimizations like proximity neighbor selection (PNS).