Factual Contracts in European Law? Critical Reflections on the Conclusions of 
AG Bobek of October 27, 2016 in case C-551/15 Pula Parking vs. Tederahn [blog 
post: blogdroiteuropeen.com]

Hess, Burkhard

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Other

Factual Contracts in European Law? Critical Reflections on the Conclusions of AG Bobek of October 27, 2016 in case C-551/15 Pula Parking vs. Tederahn [blog post: blogdroiteuropeen.com]

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons136976

Hess, Burkhard
Department I, Max Planck Institute Luxembourg, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/?s=Factual+Contracts+in+European+Law%3F+Critical+Reflections+on+the+Conclusions+of+AG+Bobek+of+October+
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Hess, B. (2016). Factual Contracts in European Law? Critical Reflections on the Conclusions of AG Bobek of October 27, 2016 in case C-551/15 Pula Parking vs. Tederahn [blog post: blogdroiteuropeen.com].

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002C-2A30-C

Abstract

Le présent post offre une analyse critique des conclusions de l’AG Bobek dans l’affaire C-551/15, Pula Parking. Bien que ce cas implique une somme d’argent négligeable, il pose néanmoins des questions essentielles quant à l’application du Règlement de Bruxelles Ibis. En effet, la Cour de Justice de l’Union européenne sera prochainement amenée à clarifier la délimitation du champ d’application matériel de ce texte et plus particulièrement la distinction entre les actions qui relèvent du droit public et celles qui appartiennent à la sphère du droit privé. Dans le cas où le Règlement s’appliquerait, ce post examine les bases juridictionnelles potentiellement disponibles en l’espèce. From time to time, the Court of Justice of the EU deals with cases which – at first sight – do not involve much money, but will nevertheless bring about far-reaching consequences for European citizens and consumers. As I would like to demonstrate in this post, Case C-551/15, Pula Parking, might become a prominent example in this respect.