UR Research > Psychology Department > Psychology Ph.D. Theses >

Contextual supports for autonomy and the development of high-quality relationships following mutual self-disclosure

URL to cite or link to: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/11376

Dissertation_Niemiec (FINAL) Submitted 04_26_2010.pdf   690.72 KB (No. of downloads : 484)
PDF of dissertation (UR-only until 6/2012)
Dissertation_Niemiec (FINAL) Submitted 04_26_2010.doc  (Restricted Access) You can try Logging In Original Word file (Admin only)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Rochester. Dept. of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, 2010.
The importance of close, caring, and mutually supportive relationships for the promotion of personal wellness and healthy social functioning is generally accepted within psychology (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). An integral process in the development of high-quality relationships is self-disclosure (Collins & Miller, 1994), which refers to revealing information about oneself to another in a sustained, escalating, and mutual way that gradually increases in depth and breadth (Altman & Taylor, 1973). Of interest is whether the motivational climate in which mutual self-disclosure occurs would affect the development of relationship closeness between strangers. Guided by self-determination theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985, 2000; Niemiec, Ryan, & Deci, 2010; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Vansteenkiste, Niemiec, & Soenens, in press), the present research addressed this issue by examining whether contextual supports for autonomy (relative to controlling contexts) promote relationship quality following mutual self-disclosure. Autonomy, which literally means self-governance, refers to the experience that behavior is enacted with a sense of ownership, volition, and reflective self-endorsement. Operationalizing the provision versus deprivation of autonomy in several ways and using a variety of self-reported and behavioral measures of closeness, the results of four experimental studies provided strong evidence to suggest that contextual supports for autonomy affect the development of high-quality relationships following mutual self-disclosure. Specifically, receipt of a monetary reward (relative to no reward; Studies 1 and 4) and ego-involvement (relative to task involvement; Study 3) had adverse effects on both self-reported and behavioral measures of relationship quality following mutual self-disclosure, whereas provision of choice (relative to no choice; Study 2) had a salubrious effect on relationship well-being. In line with the tenets of SDT, autonomy need satisfaction experienced during the mutual self-disclosure task either partially or fully explained (mediated) several of the effects of experimental condition on relational wellness. Such findings support the SDT claim that the basic psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness are complementary and, indeed, fundamental to motivation (Ryan & Powelson, 1991) and the development of authentic relationships (Ryan, 1991).
Contributor(s):
Christopher P. Niemiec (1981 - ) - Author

Edward L. Deci - Thesis Advisor

Primary Item Type:
Thesis
Language:
English
Subject Keywords:
Autonomy; Relationships; Self-determination theory; Self-disclosure
First presented to the public:
6/1/2012
Originally created:
2010
Date will be made available to public:
2012-06-01   
Original Publication Date:
2010
Previously Published By:
University of Rochester.
Citation:
Extents:
Number of Pages - xix, 142 leaves
License Grantor / Date Granted:
Marcy Strong / 2010-06-22 09:23:22.725 ( View License )
Date Deposited
2010-06-22 09:23:22.725
Date Last Updated
2012-09-26 16:35:14.586719
Submitter:
Marcy Strong

Copyright © This item is protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

All Versions

Thumbnail Name Version Created Date
Contextual supports for autonomy and the development of high-quality relationships following mutual self-disclosure1 2010-06-22 09:23:22.725