Advanced search
2 files | 817.06 KB Add to list

Scheduled maintenance: Publication downloads temporarily unavailable.

Due to maintenance publication downloads will not be available on:

  • Wednesday, March 27, 17:00 – 21:00
  • Thursday, March 28, 17:00 – 21:00

Exports of lists, FWO and BOF information will remain available.

For any questions, please contact biblio@ugent.be. Apologies for any inconveniences, and thank you for your understanding.

Designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research : an equifinality perspective

Katrien Verleye (UGent)
(2019) JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT. 30(5). p.549-576
Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose Several researchers struggle with designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research, but constructing a template for describing and justifying methodological choices is - in contrast with quantitative research - undesirable due to the creative nature of qualitative research. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the multitude of paths to rigorous case study research and promote rigorous case study research in the service community. Design/methodology/approach Based upon a review of seminal articles and textbooks, different paths to rigorous case study research are identified. Subsequently, these paths are compared with existing practices in case studies in service research published between March 2017 and April 2019. Findings Seminal articles and textbooks detail different paths to achieve rigor with regard to research purpose, design, data, analyses and write-up. Overall, the most popular paths in the service community are those proposed by Eisenhardt and Yin. Meanwhile, service researchers increasingly challenge the dichotomy between the inductive and deductive logic by choosing an abductive logic. Transparency and reflexivity are the main points of attention among service researchers doing case study research. Originality/value By providing insight into the multitude of paths to rigorous case study research along with their popularity in the service community, this paper helps service researchers to balance rigor and creativity when engaging in case study research. Additionally, this paper offers a framework for reviewing case study research in terms of rigor and creativity.
Keywords
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous), Strategy and Management, TRANSFORMATIVE SERVICE RESEARCH, VALUE COCREATION, SERVITIZATION, INNOVATION, CAPABILITIES, ENGAGEMENT, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE, CHALLENGES, MANAGEMENT, Case studies, Qualitative research, Methodology, Reflexivity, Service, Transformative services

Downloads

  • Main document - JOSM september 2019 - final.docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 401.60 KB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 415.46 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Verleye, Katrien. “Designing, Writing-up and Reviewing Case Study Research : An Equifinality Perspective.” JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, vol. 30, no. 5, 2019, pp. 549–76, doi:10.1108/josm-08-2019-0257.
APA
Verleye, K. (2019). Designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research : an equifinality perspective. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 30(5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2019-0257
Chicago author-date
Verleye, Katrien. 2019. “Designing, Writing-up and Reviewing Case Study Research : An Equifinality Perspective.” JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT 30 (5): 549–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2019-0257.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Verleye, Katrien. 2019. “Designing, Writing-up and Reviewing Case Study Research : An Equifinality Perspective.” JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT 30 (5): 549–576. doi:10.1108/josm-08-2019-0257.
Vancouver
1.
Verleye K. Designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research : an equifinality perspective. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT. 2019;30(5):549–76.
IEEE
[1]
K. Verleye, “Designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research : an equifinality perspective,” JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 549–576, 2019.
@article{8636987,
  abstract     = {{Purpose Several researchers struggle with designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research, but constructing a template for describing and justifying methodological choices is - in contrast with quantitative research - undesirable due to the creative nature of qualitative research. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the multitude of paths to rigorous case study research and promote rigorous case study research in the service community. Design/methodology/approach Based upon a review of seminal articles and textbooks, different paths to rigorous case study research are identified. Subsequently, these paths are compared with existing practices in case studies in service research published between March 2017 and April 2019. Findings Seminal articles and textbooks detail different paths to achieve rigor with regard to research purpose, design, data, analyses and write-up. Overall, the most popular paths in the service community are those proposed by Eisenhardt and Yin. Meanwhile, service researchers increasingly challenge the dichotomy between the inductive and deductive logic by choosing an abductive logic. Transparency and reflexivity are the main points of attention among service researchers doing case study research. Originality/value By providing insight into the multitude of paths to rigorous case study research along with their popularity in the service community, this paper helps service researchers to balance rigor and creativity when engaging in case study research. Additionally, this paper offers a framework for reviewing case study research in terms of rigor and creativity.}},
  author       = {{Verleye, Katrien}},
  issn         = {{1757-5818}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT}},
  keywords     = {{Tourism,Leisure and Hospitality Management,Business,Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Strategy and Management,TRANSFORMATIVE SERVICE RESEARCH,VALUE COCREATION,SERVITIZATION,INNOVATION,CAPABILITIES,ENGAGEMENT,OUTCOMES,PERFORMANCE,CHALLENGES,MANAGEMENT,Case studies,Qualitative research,Methodology,Reflexivity,Service,Transformative services}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{549--576}},
  title        = {{Designing, writing-up and reviewing case study research : an equifinality perspective}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2019-0257}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: