Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Ieromina, O.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Musters, C.J.M.; Vijver, M.G. (2016)

The effect of pesticides on the composition of aquatic macrofauna communities in field ditches

Article / Letter to editor

Ditches surrounding agricultural fields in the Netherlands are predominantly used for flood control, and they accommodate aquatic plant and animal species. Studies addressing the effects of pesticides in combination with abiotic and biotic factors on aquatic biota in ditches are scarce. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of pesticides along with environmental factors, presence of other biota and time on the community composition of aquatic macrofauna in ditches next to flower bulb fields and pastures. Macrofauna samples and environmental data were collected during two consecutive years. Ponds in a sandy dune area of a nature reserve next to the polders were sampled as control sites. Data was analyzed with the variance partitioning procedure based on the redundancy analysis (RDA). The total variance in macrofauna community composition was divided into the variance explained by pesticides, environmental factors (water chemistry parameters and macrophyte coverage), time...Show moreDitches surrounding agricultural fields in the Netherlands are predominantly used for flood control, and they accommodate aquatic plant and animal species. Studies addressing the effects of pesticides in combination with abiotic and biotic factors on aquatic biota in ditches are scarce. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of pesticides along with environmental factors, presence of other biota and time on the community composition of aquatic macrofauna in ditches next to flower bulb fields and pastures. Macrofauna samples and environmental data were collected during two consecutive years. Ponds in a sandy dune area of a nature reserve next to the polders were sampled as control sites. Data was analyzed with the variance partitioning procedure based on the redundancy analysis (RDA). The total variance in macrofauna community composition was divided into the variance explained by pesticides, environmental factors (water chemistry parameters and macrophyte coverage), time (study year and the number of the month), shared variance, and unexplained variance. The total explained variance in macrofauna community reached 22.6%. The largest proportion of explained variance was attributed to environmental factors (10.1%) followed by pesticides (5.4%) and time (4.8%). When each macrofauna group was analyzed separately, presence of other biota and environmental factors explained the largest proportion of variance in most of the macrofauna groups. Results of the study indicate that environmental factors, biotic interactions and temporal variation influence freshwater macrofauna considerably along with pesticides. We suggest that environmental managers should consider the multiple stressor contexts of aquatic ecosystems.Show less

abiotic factors

biotic factors

freshwater macrofauna

pesticides

RDA

All authors

Ieromina, O.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Musters, C.J.M.; Vijver, M.G.

Date

2016

Journal

Basic and Applied Ecology

Volume

17

Issue

2

Pages

125 - 133

Link

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.08.002