Documents
-
- Constructs of writing proficiency in U.S. state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
- Not Applicable (or Unknown)
- closed access
- Full text at publishers site
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:

Constructs of writing proficiency in U.S. state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
Persistent gaps between optimistic state and pessimistic national academic performance assessment results
are increasingly leading to calls for unified national standards in the US. Critics argue that these gaps reveal
vast differences in how proficiency is conceptualized; however, little is known about how conceptualizations
compare among large-scale US assessments. To explore this issue, the present study investigated constructs
of writing proficiency implicated in 41 US state and national high school direct writing assessments by
Show morePersistent gaps between optimistic state and pessimistic national academic performance assessment results
are increasingly leading to calls for unified national standards in the US. Critics argue that these gaps reveal
vast differences in how proficiency is conceptualized; however, little is known about how conceptualizations
compare among large-scale US assessments. To explore this issue, the present study investigated constructs
of writing proficiency implicated in 41 US state and national high school direct writing assessments by
analyzing the relationships between prompt-genre demands and assessment scoring criteria. Results of this
analysis suggest that national writing assessments differ as a group from state assessments in the extent to
which they emphasize genre distinctions and present coherent conceptualizations of writing proficiency. The
implications of these assessment variations for college preparedness are discussed.
Show less- All authors
- Jeffery, J.V.
- Date
- 2009
- Journal
- Assessing Writing
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3 - 24
- Advanced Publication
- Yes